2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of tensile properties of non-crimp 3D orthogonal weave and multi-layer plain weave E-glass composites. Part 2: Comprehensive experimental results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
68
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The local longitudinal stiffness on the surface of the sample was distributed with the resin rich channels being the lowest, surface weft tow being the intermediate, and the binder region being the highest, which resulted in this strain distribution. Similar strain patterns have been reported on different types of 3D woven composites [5,25]. The strain distribution around the notch exhibited a pattern similar to the typical "butterfly" pattern in an isotropic sample.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The local longitudinal stiffness on the surface of the sample was distributed with the resin rich channels being the lowest, surface weft tow being the intermediate, and the binder region being the highest, which resulted in this strain distribution. Similar strain patterns have been reported on different types of 3D woven composites [5,25]. The strain distribution around the notch exhibited a pattern similar to the typical "butterfly" pattern in an isotropic sample.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Developed from the traditional weaving technology, 3D woven composites provide better through-thickness properties and higher post-impact strength compared to the traditional 2D laminated composites [3,4]. However, the in-plane quasi-static properties of the 3D woven composites are generally lower than the 2D laminates due to fibre crimping induced by the interlacing movement during weaving process [1,5], and the fatigue properties of the 3D woven composites also seem to be lower than the comparable 2D composites [2,6,7,8]. The advantage of 3D woven composites is that they can be tailored to specific applications where certain mechanical properties (such as impact tolerance) are desired while other properties (such as in-plane tensile strength) are less critical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weaving process followed ensures high consistency of the preform architecture and minimal waviness of the in-plane fibres in both the warp and weft directions. Several experimental studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] have shown that there is very low waviness of the warp and weft directional tows, which allows enhanced mechanical properties to be achieved. This category of composites is characterized with practically straight and well-aligned in-plane fibres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The textile preform used in this study was a single-ply 3DNCOW E-glass designated "3D-78" [4] with an areal density of 2640 g⋅m -2 ; this type of preform has been used previously in experimental studies [4,5]. The preform was manufactured by 3TEX.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…composites [5,7,11]. As indicated above, for this investigation of late-stage fatigue damage in "3D-78" specimens, the 8 mm wide specimens were investigated in detail;…”
Section: Mechanical Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%