2014
DOI: 10.1145/2637364.2592017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of core power gating strategies implemented in modern hardware

Abstract: Idle power is a significant contributor to overall energy consumption in modern multi-core processors. Cores can enter a full-sleep state, also known as C6, to reduce idle power; however, entering C6 incurs performance and power overheads. Since power gating can result in negative savings, hardware vendors implement various algorithms to manage C6 entry. In this paper, we examine state-of-the-art C6 entry algorithms and present a comparative analysis in the context of consumer and CPU-GPU benchmarks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the system level, energy-efficiency improvement techniques developed for the smart grid [Li et al 2015b], electric vehicles , and cloud computing [Li et al 2016] can be transformed to fit to the IoT energy efficiency problem, and protocols can be improved by reducing the number of transmissions and the amount of data in each transmission so as to cut down the power consumption for communication. At the circuit level, there are many promising low power techniques, such as power gating [Arora et al 2014], dynamic voltage and frequency scaling , and near-and subthreshold computing [Pinckney et al 2016;Li et al 2015]. At the device level, efforts have been spent on reducing leakage power consumption of transistors [Bardine et al 2014], and a great amount of power-harvesting devices are being designed and implemented to avoid the cost and scalability challenge of battery replacement in such large numbers [Klinefelter et al 2015;Battista et al 2014;Fadhil et al 2014].…”
Section: Problem Description 5 (Energy Efficiency) Given An Iot Systmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the system level, energy-efficiency improvement techniques developed for the smart grid [Li et al 2015b], electric vehicles , and cloud computing [Li et al 2016] can be transformed to fit to the IoT energy efficiency problem, and protocols can be improved by reducing the number of transmissions and the amount of data in each transmission so as to cut down the power consumption for communication. At the circuit level, there are many promising low power techniques, such as power gating [Arora et al 2014], dynamic voltage and frequency scaling , and near-and subthreshold computing [Pinckney et al 2016;Li et al 2015]. At the device level, efforts have been spent on reducing leakage power consumption of transistors [Bardine et al 2014], and a great amount of power-harvesting devices are being designed and implemented to avoid the cost and scalability challenge of battery replacement in such large numbers [Klinefelter et al 2015;Battista et al 2014;Fadhil et al 2014].…”
Section: Problem Description 5 (Energy Efficiency) Given An Iot Systmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a power emergency strikes, a well-designed power management scheme should not only decrease the power consumption to meet the new power constraint but also reduce the impact on performance as much as possible. Prior work that investigated voltage/frequency scaling [3,4], shutting-down schemes [6,7,17], and specialization [8], can potentially be used to address, to varying degrees, the problem of power emergencies. For example, when power emergency occurs, we can scale down the voltage/frequency to cut down the power consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%