2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-0101(99)00205-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of different methods to assess the hemorrhagic activity of Bothrops venoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…jararaca venom was performed using the in vivo model of local hemorrhage, as previously described in the literature, with a few modifications [41, 42]. Groups of 5 animals were treated with different doses of HE of K .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…jararaca venom was performed using the in vivo model of local hemorrhage, as previously described in the literature, with a few modifications [41, 42]. Groups of 5 animals were treated with different doses of HE of K .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hemoglobin content of the excised hemorrhagic halo was calculated from a standard curve of hemoglobin. The hemorrhage was expressed as the hemoglobin content (mg/mL) extracted from hemorrhagic halos after subcutaneous injection of venom [35, 41]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hemorrhagic activity of B. erythromelas and B. jararaca venoms was induced using the in vivo model of local hemorrhage, as previously described in the literature with few modifications [27]. Groups of 5 animals were treated with different doses of the extract (50–200 mg/kg, i.p.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hemorrhagic activity of B. jararaca venom was performed using the in vivo model of local hemorrhage, as previously described in literature, with a few modifications [30]. Groups of 5 animals were treated with different doses of J. gossypiifolia extract (50, 100 and 200 mg/kg, in a volume of 10 mL/kg of body weight) p.o.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%