2004
DOI: 10.1080/08824090409359991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of exemplar and statistical evidence in reducing counter‐arguments and responses to a message

Abstract: A growing body of research indicates that both exemplar and statistical evidence are equally persuasive, but that persuasion is achieved differently due to the responses individuals have to these two forms of evidence. This study investigated the use of exemplars to reduce the generation of counterarguments and overall responses to a message compared to statistical evidence. Participants were exposed to a professionally produced 60 second videotaped public service announcement (PSA) on the dangers of tanning. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical evidence is more effective in altering beliefs and attitudes, which are arguably more cognitive in nature, while narrative evidence is more effective in altering intentions, which are more affective [24]. Additionally, several studies suggest that narrative evidence may be less cognitively elaborated, as it is subject to less defensive processing [25] and less counter-argument [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical evidence is more effective in altering beliefs and attitudes, which are arguably more cognitive in nature, while narrative evidence is more effective in altering intentions, which are more affective [24]. Additionally, several studies suggest that narrative evidence may be less cognitively elaborated, as it is subject to less defensive processing [25] and less counter-argument [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonstatistical expressions denote health-promoting messages without any precise numbers and are usually used in the description of examples and stories [ 53 ]. No conclusion has been reached about the persuasiveness of these two expression types [ 34 ]. A meta-analysis [ 23 ] and an investigation of 1270 participants [ 54 ] found that statistical messages were more convincing than narrative ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A statistical expression message refers to a missive that contains quantitative or numerical information [ 33 ]. Many studies have compared the persuasiveness of different types of information organization, especially the statistical and narrative evidence types, albeit with inconclusive results [ 34 , 35 ]. Allen and Preiss [ 23 ] believed that the use of statistical expressions in a highly technological world is crucial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides positive message evaluations, a number of authors observe another interesting pattern. [43] find that numerical messages lead to more cognitive responses than narrative messages and argue that this difference might be "a result of difficulty in disputing someone's story" (p. 296) as opposed to disputing more objective, numerical evidence. Research by Slater and Rouner [34], too, finds considerable differences in the effects of numerical and narrative evidence for different groups of recipients, namely that value-affirmative recipients (who process value-congruent messages as a means to reinforce existing beliefs) use numerical messages to reinforce existing beliefs, while value-protective recipients (who defend their values against value-discrepant messages) tend to counter-argue against numerical evidence.…”
Section: The Persuasive Effects Of Numerical and Narrative Messagesmentioning
confidence: 94%