2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-2194(01)00068-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of potential labor-saving sampling methods for assessing large mammal damage in corn

Abstract: Accurate estimation of crop damage by wildlife often requires labor-intensive sampling procedures. Variable area transect (VAT) sampling has been identified as a potential labor-saving alternative to quadrat sampling. We fully enumerated all damaged corn plants in a field to assess accuracy of sampling by small quadrats 5 m long by one or two row-widths, and by VAT sampling with searches from random starting points to the 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th damaged plant. Two widths for strip transects also were considered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimation typically improved as transect width increased. This effect also has been observed empirically in an experiment on damage sampling in row crops (Engeman and Sterner, 2002). Nevertheless, there are logistical limits to the transect width for any sampling situation whereby observations can be effectively and accurately made.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Estimation typically improved as transect width increased. This effect also has been observed empirically in an experiment on damage sampling in row crops (Engeman and Sterner, 2002). Nevertheless, there are logistical limits to the transect width for any sampling situation whereby observations can be effectively and accurately made.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Engeman et al (1998) made no mention of the width of the VAT used in their study, given that the ''objects'' in their simulations were dimensionless points and varied only by location. More recently, and Engeman and Sterner (2002) used VAT to estimate row crop damage due to herbivory. The behavior of decreasing density estimates with increasing sample width was not noted in their analysis, although an examination of their methods and results shows a congruent pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed damage to corn in treatment and control fields in early August using a variable‐area‐transect sampling method (Engeman and Sugihara 1998, Engeman and Sterner 2002). The location of each sampling plot was chosen within treatment and control fields at random and with replacement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%