2014
DOI: 10.5935/abc.20140118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Radiation Dose Between Standard and 3D Angiography in Congenital Heart Disease

Abstract: Background The use of three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) to assess patients with congenital heart diseases appears to be a promising technique despite the scarce literature available. Objectives The objective of this study was to describe our initial experience with 3D-RA and to compare its radiation dose to that of standard two-dimensional angiography (2D-SA). Methods Between September 2011 and April 2012, 18 patients underwent simultaneous 3D-RA and 2D-SA during diagnostic cardiac catheterizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing measured and reported radiation dose surrogates is a common practice in fluoroscopic and interventional applications. [24][25][26] There is considerable utility in capturing and analyzing these metrics for use in quality programs and to establish notification and substantial radiation dose levels. 27 Assessing the impact of K a,r and air kerma area product between interventions can be complicated as it does not account for geometric factors, colli- mation, obstacles in the path of radiation (table, pad, head support, etc) and differences in beam quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing measured and reported radiation dose surrogates is a common practice in fluoroscopic and interventional applications. [24][25][26] There is considerable utility in capturing and analyzing these metrics for use in quality programs and to establish notification and substantial radiation dose levels. 27 Assessing the impact of K a,r and air kerma area product between interventions can be complicated as it does not account for geometric factors, colli- mation, obstacles in the path of radiation (table, pad, head support, etc) and differences in beam quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gregor Krings: With the new imaging system at the Heart Center in Utrecht, introduced in 2011, we had the opportunity to start with this 3DRA technique. Our experience so far is some 700-800 cases over the last years [19,20,[30][31][32]. From the interventions we do in our institution I would say that probably 70-80% are based on 3DRA or imported previous CTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Like many disruptive technologies, its introduction has divided opinion. Cost, benefit, radiation and contrast exposure have fed the natural resistance to change and whilst the potential harm is low the benefits have also been difficult to quantify [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies directly estimate ED from DAP [1012]. However, the relation between DAP and ED for 3DRA has never been strongly confirmed [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%