2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of random forest variable selection methods for classification prediction modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
393
0
12

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 940 publications
(408 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
393
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, the use of Sentinel-2 data for habitat suitability mapping should be viewed as an effective compromise between spatial (10 m) and temporal resolution (5-6 days), as well as its open-data policy. Regarding the statistical methods inherent to SDMs, further studies are recommended in this research field in order to understand the best robustness of approaches able to handle high dimensional data [102], as well addressed to examine the predictive performances of multiple algorithms, especially when concomitantly integrated into an ensemble modeling framework [18,43]. This would be particularly interesting when evaluating how sub-sampled group of variables (remote-sensing products, topography, landscape variables) may singularly impact on the performance of species distribution models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the use of Sentinel-2 data for habitat suitability mapping should be viewed as an effective compromise between spatial (10 m) and temporal resolution (5-6 days), as well as its open-data policy. Regarding the statistical methods inherent to SDMs, further studies are recommended in this research field in order to understand the best robustness of approaches able to handle high dimensional data [102], as well addressed to examine the predictive performances of multiple algorithms, especially when concomitantly integrated into an ensemble modeling framework [18,43]. This would be particularly interesting when evaluating how sub-sampled group of variables (remote-sensing products, topography, landscape variables) may singularly impact on the performance of species distribution models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UDC 004.93 DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2020.197319 models suggested in known literary sources [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], is associated with certain limitations and requirements for target functions. When applying such methods, it is impossible to increase the accuracy of the forecast when parameters change, for example, in forecasting the dependence of indicators of public health on pollutant emissions in the air.…”
Section: запропоновано генетичний метод для прогнозування показникIв mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], the results of studies into the use of Bayesian networks for the prediction of morbidity were reported. Bayesian networks have been shown to be an effective, compact, and intuitive way of representing the uncertainty-related knowledge.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations