2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-007-9226-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Composite Indicator for University Quality Assesment: The Case of Spanish Higher Education System

Abstract: Composite indicator, Data envelopment analysis, Quality assessment, Higher education,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
51
1
18

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
51
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Murias et al (2008) argue two main reasons for this: the increase in competition among universities in order to recruit students and the new dynamism in the financing of these institutions. ANECA 1 (2008) also underlines the importance of disclosing information online in order to achieve quality certifications (particularly in doctoral studies).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murias et al (2008) argue two main reasons for this: the increase in competition among universities in order to recruit students and the new dynamism in the financing of these institutions. ANECA 1 (2008) also underlines the importance of disclosing information online in order to achieve quality certifications (particularly in doctoral studies).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of the state-run universities in Spain, using DEA, is evaluated by Murias et al [13], García and Palomares [14], Gómez [15], and Fernández et al [16]; the first apply the CCR model aimed at outputs and determine the results are better for the universities located in wealthier areas; the second evaluate teaching and research results through CCR and BCC models aimed at outputs and calculate the Malmquist productivity indices; the third highlights the potentiality of DEA for these types of measurements in the public sector, uses the method with CCR constant scale yields along with BCC variable yields and concludes that the number of efficient universities is higher in the models with variable yield than in those of constant yield; the last, through BCC and CCR models aimed at outputs study the mission teaching and research functions after implanting the LOU. Cunha and Rocha [17] do the same in Portugal by contrasting the results of the public universities by evaluating teaching through CCR and BCC models aimed at inputs and conclude that few are efficient.…”
Section: Application Of Dea In Public Universitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of this group of models in CI construction can be found in [7][8][9]. However, in recent years much more attention has been focused on the application of a new group of DEA models in the field of composite indicators which is known as the "benefit of the doubt" (BOD) approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%