2017
DOI: 10.3791/55271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Procedure to Evaluate the <em>In Vivo</em> Performance of Cancer Nanomedicines

Abstract: Inspired by the success of previous cancer nanomedicines in the clinic, researchers have generated a large number of novel formulations in the past decade. However, only a small number of nanomedicines have been approved for clinical use, whereas the majority of nanomedicines under clinical development have produced disappointing results. One major obstacle to the successful clinical translation of new cancer nanomedicines is the lack of an accurate understanding of their in vivo performance. This article feat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important difficulty in obtaining a successful translation of innovative formulations in clinical practice is the lack of knowledge of their in vivo performance at systemic, tissue, and cellular levels ( Tang et al, 2017 ). This large gap between the design of nanosystems and their effective clinical application is primarily due to the partial understanding of the in vivo fate of nanomaterials.…”
Section: Drug Targetingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important difficulty in obtaining a successful translation of innovative formulations in clinical practice is the lack of knowledge of their in vivo performance at systemic, tissue, and cellular levels ( Tang et al, 2017 ). This large gap between the design of nanosystems and their effective clinical application is primarily due to the partial understanding of the in vivo fate of nanomaterials.…”
Section: Drug Targetingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, fluorescent or radiolabelling of nanoparticles allows noninvasive in vivo imaging of the drug dynamics. 98,99 A few preclinical studies have already used nanoparticles designed for selective immunotherapy of CVD. 100,101 For example, systemic administration of nanoparticles for selective Ccl2 transcriptional silencing in bone marrow niche endothelial cells efficiently inhibited leucocyte egress and translated into reduced cardiac leucocyte recruitment upon MI.…”
Section: Immunotherapy For Cardiac Disease: Emerging Targets and Deli...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of nanomedicine has largely motivated the study of nanoparticle–protein interactions to improve nanoparticle function in applications including drug delivery, disease diagnostics, treatment, and prevention. Nanoparticle-based sensors have been used to detect metal ions, small molecules, and proteins including biomarkers for early cancer and kidney disease. As nanotechnologies become more widely used in biological settings, it is increasingly important to understand and predict nanoparticle function and fate in vivo ; despite the successes of some, many nanomaterials produce unsatisfactory results or off-target effects during clinical trials. This translation of nanomedicines from laboratory development to clinical practice is limited by our lack of control over interactions between the nanoparticle and its surrounding bioenvironment. , Although the intrinsic physicochemical characteristics of the nanoparticle determine in vitro functionality, the environment around the nanoparticle in the applied setting, such as blood plasma for intravenous delivery, will play a dominant role in determining the ultimate nanoparticle fate and function.…”
Section: Nanoparticle-based Sensors For Agricultural Innovations and ...mentioning
confidence: 99%