2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive review on water management strategies and developments in anion exchange membrane fuel cells

Abstract: In spite of significant achievements in alkaline exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs) in recent years, they are still lagging behind proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) due to performance instability. Among the relevant operational parameters of AEMFC, the researchers have found that poor water management within the cell was the main reason for failure of the system. In the past five years, numerous modeling and experimental works were reported proposing different strategies to improve water manageme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
(160 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spikes in the cell voltage are most likely due to periodic drying in the cell, as the average relative humidity remained constant at 73% for the duration of the experiment. We postulate that this could have been improved if the dew points were slightly adjusted to ensure that the cell was adequately humidified as explained by Hassan et al , 87 a thinner membrane was used to increase water back-diffusion from the anode to the cathode creating a more than desirable water gradient inside the fuel cell as supported by Veh et al , 88 and the cathode catalyst layer (CCL) was coated at a higher loading, making it thicker in order to better attract and retain more back-diffused water and in turn decreasing the overall cell resistance and providing adequate water for ORR and AEM hydration as explained by Gutru et al , 89 in their recent, comprehensive review on water management strategies in AEMFCs. The H 2 /air longevity data is some of the only data reported in the literature for precious-metal-free cathode catalysts in AEMFCs, as indicated by Table S4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spikes in the cell voltage are most likely due to periodic drying in the cell, as the average relative humidity remained constant at 73% for the duration of the experiment. We postulate that this could have been improved if the dew points were slightly adjusted to ensure that the cell was adequately humidified as explained by Hassan et al , 87 a thinner membrane was used to increase water back-diffusion from the anode to the cathode creating a more than desirable water gradient inside the fuel cell as supported by Veh et al , 88 and the cathode catalyst layer (CCL) was coated at a higher loading, making it thicker in order to better attract and retain more back-diffused water and in turn decreasing the overall cell resistance and providing adequate water for ORR and AEM hydration as explained by Gutru et al , 89 in their recent, comprehensive review on water management strategies in AEMFCs. The H 2 /air longevity data is some of the only data reported in the literature for precious-metal-free cathode catalysts in AEMFCs, as indicated by Table S4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells are one type of fuel cell suitable for portable and transportation applications, which feature quick start-up, low operation temperature, low cost, high efficiency, and so on [ 1 , 2 ]. Depending on the polymer electrolyte membrane, this type of fuel cell can be further divided into proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) [ 3 , 4 ] and anion exchange membrane fuel cell (AEMFC) [ 5 , 6 ]. AEMFC has been attracted considerable attention in the recent decade due to several advantages over PEMFC, including (1) faster oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) under the basic condition that allows the catalyst at the cathode to employ platinum-free metal or low-platinum catalysts [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], (2) negligible fuel crossover owing to the hydroxide transport direction opposite to the direction of liquid fuel’s crossover (e.g., methanol) [ 10 , 11 ], as well as (3) minimized corrosion problems in alkaline environments [ 2 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the development of new AEMs, other modifications improve water transport by (1) optimizing the hydrophilic/hydrophobicity of electrodes; 2) optimizing of Pt loading and ionomer in the catalyst layer; 3) employing thin and robust AEMs. [142]…”
Section: Water Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%