2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational model for biofilm-based microbial fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
240
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 388 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
14
240
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This value for V biomass / Q ( Q is the accumulated charge) was then inserted into Equations (6) and (7) (see Experimental Section), yielding 42.15 mgCODbiomass  gCODacetate −1 (coulombic efficiency (CE)=0.958). This obtained yield is a feasible value, being within range of earlier reported biomass yields27 and lower but comparable to the theoretical maximum biomass yield of 109 mgCODbiomass  gCODacetate −1 (CE=0.891) calculated at the used anode potential of −0.35 V by using the thermodynamic approach from Picioreanu et al 32. Thus, we show that by using a combination of OCT and chronoamperometric data—both noninvasive measurements—we can derive valid biomass growth yields from the tested systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value for V biomass / Q ( Q is the accumulated charge) was then inserted into Equations (6) and (7) (see Experimental Section), yielding 42.15 mgCODbiomass  gCODacetate −1 (coulombic efficiency (CE)=0.958). This obtained yield is a feasible value, being within range of earlier reported biomass yields27 and lower but comparable to the theoretical maximum biomass yield of 109 mgCODbiomass  gCODacetate −1 (CE=0.891) calculated at the used anode potential of −0.35 V by using the thermodynamic approach from Picioreanu et al 32. Thus, we show that by using a combination of OCT and chronoamperometric data—both noninvasive measurements—we can derive valid biomass growth yields from the tested systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For a systematic exploration of the effects of operational parameters on biomass development and, ultimately, system performance,31 mathematical modeling and model validation provide useful tools 32, 33, 34. A major threshold, however, hindering further calibration and validation of currently available models, concerns adequate monitoring of the catalyst loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An MBER model consists of two parts, MFCs and MBR, linked by some key factors such as organic loading rates (OLR), aeration intensity, and reactor configuration. The available MFC/MEC models are based on Nernst-Monod type of equations to calculate substrate consumption and bacteria growth in the anodic compartment, but the mass transfer equations vary depending on the spatial distribution of substrates and microbial activities (Kato Marcus et al 2007;Picioreanu et al 2007;Ping et al 2014;Pinto et al 2010). The existing MBR models are derived from activated sludge model (ASM) with a physical membrane filtration process (Ng and Kim 2007).…”
Section: Responsible Editor: Marcus Schulzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Sirinutsomboon [6] includes into the mass balance Fick's second law to describe the substrate profile evolution into the biofilm in one dimension. Picioreanu et al [7] propose spatial concentration gradients in one-, two-, or three-dimensional setups. Picioreanu et al [8] consider that solutes move not only by diffusion, but also by convection and electromigration in a two-dimensional biofilm model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Involvement of soluble mediators, which has already been modeled by [7,8], justifies the existence of an oxidation and reduction reaction in the anode surface, which always occurs in any electrode-electrolyte interface [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%