2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mio.2016.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computer vision approach for monitoring the spatial and temporal shrimp distribution at the LoVe observatory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique was tested at a high frequency (i.e., 30 min) and over a long–lasting period of time (i.e., one year). We found that it is a reliable benchmark for scaling to other still video sources, either in deeper continental margin areas–such as in the LoVE observatory 35 and the NEPTUNE network 36 )–or on board of mobile platforms–such as ARGO floats, ROVs, AUVs 33 , 37 , 38 and crawlers 39 , 40 if the hypothesis that the not relevant information (e.g. background, bio-fouling over the camera) changes more slowly, along the time, than the relevant subjects (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This technique was tested at a high frequency (i.e., 30 min) and over a long–lasting period of time (i.e., one year). We found that it is a reliable benchmark for scaling to other still video sources, either in deeper continental margin areas–such as in the LoVE observatory 35 and the NEPTUNE network 36 )–or on board of mobile platforms–such as ARGO floats, ROVs, AUVs 33 , 37 , 38 and crawlers 39 , 40 if the hypothesis that the not relevant information (e.g. background, bio-fouling over the camera) changes more slowly, along the time, than the relevant subjects (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The image patches are anyhow by orders of magnitude smaller than the entire images in FIA and a subset of them can be displayed on a screen in a rapid serial visual presentation (i.e., showing one patch at a time and with dynamic updates like in a slideshow) or in a rich gridded visual presentation (i.e., several patches in parallel and static) (see Figure 2 on the right). SPC has seen rare applications in marine image annotation yet [except in case of posterior inspections of annotations obtained by a computer vision system (Schoening et al, 2012b;Osterloff et al, 2016;Schoening et al, under review)] since it needs a sophisticated data base model to represent the annotations ROIs and classifications. Annotation projects carried out with the so called random points approach can be considered a SPC task, since the observer inspects a given number of randomly set points in an image and classifies the image content at those image points to one category.…”
Section: A Taxonomy For Labeling Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This call has been answered by promising achievements in algorithmic annotation, such as automated classification of seabeds and habitats (Pican et al, 1998;Pizarro et al, 2009), coral segmentation (Purser et al, 2009;Tusa et al, 2014), and classification (Beijbom et al, 2012(Beijbom et al, , 2015, detection, and spatial analysis of shrimp populations (Purser et al, 2013;Osterloff et al, 2016), detection and classification of mega fauna in benthic images (Schoening et al, 2012b;Schoening et al, under review) or the computation of image footprint size with automatically detected laser points (Schoening et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No detailed analysis has been performed on the community composition or the reef mounds in the Hola trough, but still images show that the dominant reef-building coral species is Lophelia pertusa (Osterloff et al 2016b). This scleractinian coral is the dominant reef builder in European waters (Roberts et al 2006), although Madrepora oculata can also occur as smaller parts of the reefs on the Norwegian shelf (Järnegren and Kutti 2014).…”
Section: Location Of the Love Observatorymentioning
confidence: 99%