1997
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-63223-9_124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A connectionist approach to structural similarity determination as a basis of clustering, classification and feature detection

Abstract: Many algorithms in machine learning, knowledge discovery, pattern recognition and classification are based on the estimation of the similarity or the distance between the analysed objects. Objects with higher structural complexity often cannot be described by feature vectors without losing important structural information. These objects can adequately be represented in the language of logic or by labeled graphs. The similarity of such descriptions is difficult to define and to compute. In this paper, a cormect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, one can approach the approximate isomorphism problem as the problem of minimizing a certain error function on the space of correspondence matrices subject to structural constraints, and solve the problem using the full arsenal of optimization methods (Gold & Rangarajan 1996;Rangarajan & Mjolsness 1994;Pelillo 1998). Third, a number of neural-net and related iterative approaches have been presented (Schadler & Wysotzki 1997;Schädler & Wysotzki 1999;Melnik, Garcia-Molina, & Rahm 2002). This paper continues work on the simple approach of (Goldstone & Rogosky 2002) that was originally inspired by constraint propagation neural networks for consistent visual interpretation or analogical reasoning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Second, one can approach the approximate isomorphism problem as the problem of minimizing a certain error function on the space of correspondence matrices subject to structural constraints, and solve the problem using the full arsenal of optimization methods (Gold & Rangarajan 1996;Rangarajan & Mjolsness 1994;Pelillo 1998). Third, a number of neural-net and related iterative approaches have been presented (Schadler & Wysotzki 1997;Schädler & Wysotzki 1999;Melnik, Garcia-Molina, & Rahm 2002). This paper continues work on the simple approach of (Goldstone & Rogosky 2002) that was originally inspired by constraint propagation neural networks for consistent visual interpretation or analogical reasoning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The objective function here was another approach, Schadler et. al [64] report using a neural-network optimization procedure for 2D chemical graphs.…”
Section: Approximate Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%