2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A consistent method for modelling PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations across the United Kingdom in 2004 for air quality assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors have used a gravimetric analysis of atmospheric particles to describe and control the toxicity of atmospheric contamination [22,23,24,25,26], since this could be associated with its composition or with the proportion of the fine fraction. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have used a gravimetric analysis of atmospheric particles to describe and control the toxicity of atmospheric contamination [22,23,24,25,26], since this could be associated with its composition or with the proportion of the fine fraction. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 mean concentration of 29.6 µg m −3 . In a similar approach, Stedman et al (2007) used a quadratic relationship between the number of days with PM 10 concentrations greater than 50 µg m −3 and the annual mean to derive an equivalent annual mean concentration of 31.5 µg m −3 . Hence we assess compliance with respect to an equivalent annual mean limit value of 30 µg m −3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that using the gravimetric method, an average water content contribute to 20-35% of particle mass (Tsyro 2005, Stedman et al 2007). If other than reference method is used, an appropriate scaling factor must be used to assure equivalence.…”
Section: According To the Emep Estimates For The Year 2007 Poland Holmentioning
confidence: 99%