2013
DOI: 10.1021/es403097z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Contemporary Carbon Balance for the Northeast Region of the United States

Abstract: Development of regional policies to reduce net emissions of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) would benefit from the quantification of the major components of the region's carbon balancefossil fuel CO 2 emissions and net fluxes between land ecosystems and the atmosphere. Through spatially detailed inventories of fossil fuel CO 2 emissions and a terrestrial biogeochemistry model, we produce the first estimate of regional carbon balance for the Northeast United States between 2001 and 2005. Our analysis reveals that the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More pristine watersheds in the region are likely in Zone I. For C in our example, since sequestration capacity is already exhausted in the region (i.e., currently far more C is emitted than sequestered [37,38]), there is little possibility of increase due to additional impact (Zone III). If anything, the region's C sequestration capacity may decline with increasing impact, particularly under agricultural extensification scenarios in which native landforms are replaced by land use activities with reduced sequestration capacity; hence, ultimately, the possibility of declining services with increasing impact (Zone IV).…”
Section: Isides and The Kinetics Of Regulating Ecosystem Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More pristine watersheds in the region are likely in Zone I. For C in our example, since sequestration capacity is already exhausted in the region (i.e., currently far more C is emitted than sequestered [37,38]), there is little possibility of increase due to additional impact (Zone III). If anything, the region's C sequestration capacity may decline with increasing impact, particularly under agricultural extensification scenarios in which native landforms are replaced by land use activities with reduced sequestration capacity; hence, ultimately, the possibility of declining services with increasing impact (Zone IV).…”
Section: Isides and The Kinetics Of Regulating Ecosystem Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimate for 2013 is for a terrestrial biosphere sink of 2.5 ± 0.5 PgC year -1 , which offsets 23 % of anthropogenic emissions (GCP 2015). However, to better understand the terrestrial carbon cycle, and to evaluate the possibilities for increased carbon sequestration, there is wide interest in quantifying carbon fluxes at more local and regional scales (Lu et al 2013). Carbon flux can be monitored at the ecosystem scale with the eddy covariance approach (Baldocchi et al 2001), or repeated biometric inventories (Curtis et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the intermediate scales of landscape, ecoregion, and region, evaluating carbon flux is more difficult and uncertain. Spatial heterogeneity in climate, soils, disturbance regime, and forest management, as well as temporal variation in weather all contribute to variation in carbon sources and sinks (Lu et al 2013;Turner et al 2015a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon stocks in urban ecosystem are altered directly and indirectly by human activities Hubacek et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2013a,b;Chen, 2013, 2014a,b). The effects of the attendant increases in urban land uses on the storage of carbon are largely unknown (Lorenz and Lal, 2009;Zhao et al, 2010a,b;Scalenghe et al, 2011;Lu et al, 2013). In the coming decades, the amount of carbon contained in human settlements will grow because urban areas are continuing to expand at an unprecedented rate (Churkina et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%