A Content Analysis of Hospitality Reports from the Center of Hospitality Research in Cornell University: 2001-2014

Wang, Wei

doi:10.4236/ojapps.2015.510061

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the theme of hospitality marketing, marketing management, marketing environment and marketing function have become the research perspective for marketing in hospitality. Specifically, scholars divided hospitality marketing into e-marketing, consumer/traveler behavior, planning, festivals/events/exhibitions, website management/social media/technology adoption and finance/economic/law/accounting (Bowen and Sparks, 1998; Yoo et al , 2011; Line and Runyan, 2012; Nunkoo et al , 2013; Wang, 2015; Aksoy et al , 2022). Hospitality management is also a vital theme.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analyzing review studies of the recent development in hospitality

Law,

Chen,

et al. 2023

IJCHM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to analyze review research in hospitality, identifying the structure and most recent developments in current hospitality review studies while providing exploratory insights for future research in this research area. Design/methodology/approach Using bibliometric analysis, content analysis and a quantitative systematic literature review, this study provides a comprehensive review and critical analysis of 128 review studies published in leading hospitality journals (International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, International Journal of Hospitality Management and Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management). Findings This paper presents a comprehensive and in-depth discussion based on the title, journal source, author contribution, year of publication, sample size, selected period, database selection, methodology, data collection methods, themes, regional selection, keywords, abstracts and results of the hospitality review studies analyzed. The findings provide new insights to advance the theoretical and practical implications of review studies in hospitality. Research limitations/implications This research provides critical insights for both hospitality review studies and academic and industry hospitality personnel. Originality/value As a pioneering study in research on review studies, the results of this paper focus not only on a systematic overview and assessment of recent hospitality review works but also on the future agenda of hospitality and review studies.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analyzing review studies of the recent development in hospitality

Law,

Chen,

et al. 2023

IJCHM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A sample of research articles published between the period of 2000-2015 in the leadingtravel,tourismandhospitalityjournalswereexamined.Thesejournals(see Table1)wereselectedsincetheyrankamongthetop-tierscientificjournalsinthe tourism, hospitality and travel field, with high impact factors and citation levels (Gürsoy&Sandstrom,2014).Asimplecontentanalysiswascarriedouttocompare thepercentageofthepublishedarticlesreportingsignificantfindings(i.e.,rejectionof thenullhypothesis)tothepercentageofthepublishedarticlesreportinginsignificant findings(i.e.,supportforthenullhypothesis).Weusedthesimplesearchterm"null hypothesis" on articles available in databases (Scopus, Emerald, journal sites) and languagerestrictionwasapplied.OurfocuswasonarticleswritteninEnglishonly. All full-text articles containing the term "null hypothesis" were retrieved and this searchproducedatotalof303articles.Thentwoauthorscheckedthemtoidentify thetypeofdataanalysisprocedureappliedfortestingthenullhypothesis.Retrieved articleswerecheckedforthespecifictestsrelatingtohypothesistesting,namelyt-test, Anova,correlationanalysis,MultipleRegression,structuralequationmodelling,as theyarethemostcommonlyuseddataanalysisprocedureforhypothesistesting (Wang, 2015).Itwasobservedthatsomeresearcherstendtoprefertheuseofderivativesof t-testsuchas"independentsamplet-test"or"Students't-test".159articlestesting nullhypothesisbasedonmeandifferencestestsorrelationshiptestswereretained. Thenumberofarticlesdeemedsufficientconsideringthesimilarnumberofarticles in meta analyses.…”

Section: The Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

An Analysis of “Publication Bias” in the Travel, Tourism, and Hospitality Research

Yüksel

Туфан

2017

International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines whether studies with favorable or statistically significant outcomes are more likely to be published than studies with null results. Should such a publication tendency be in the form of favoring significant findings exist, then the integrity of science, suggestions and conclusions becomes controversial. This also includes those particularly drawn from meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Drawing on a sample of research articles, an examination was undertaken to determine whether studies reporting significant findings were published more. Additional analyses were conducted to examine the validity of reject/support decisions in relation to null hypotheses tested in these studies. The share of the published articles, in which null hypotheses were rejected, was found to be much larger (81%). Interestingly however, calculated power levels and actual samples sizes of these studies were too small to confidently reject/support null hypotheses. Implications for research are discussed in the concluding section of the article.

show abstract