2013
DOI: 10.1134/s0040601513060116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coolant flow simulation in fast reactor wire-wrapped assembly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Volkov et al found that using high-Reynolds k-ε turbulence model to simulate the flow in the fuel pin bundle could reduce the dimension of the computational mesh. The results are in good agreement with the empirical dependences and international calculations [6]. Talebi et al conducted a parameter research of the Reynolds number, inlet temperature and heat flux on the fluid flow, and heat transfer inside the sub-channel with a CFD code that solves the algorithm [7].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Volkov et al found that using high-Reynolds k-ε turbulence model to simulate the flow in the fuel pin bundle could reduce the dimension of the computational mesh. The results are in good agreement with the empirical dependences and international calculations [6]. Talebi et al conducted a parameter research of the Reynolds number, inlet temperature and heat flux on the fluid flow, and heat transfer inside the sub-channel with a CFD code that solves the algorithm [7].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Unfortunately, further information on the numerical scheme and the used wall functions is not given. Volkov et al (2013) reported for the k-ε model a discrepancy in the pressure loss of about 10% between wall function and wall resolved formulation. Mikuž and Shams (2019) reported similar observations for bare rod bundle flow similar to Configuration 1 of section 3.2.…”
Section: Quantitative Comparison Of Pressure Lossesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…After starting the vacuum pump and opening the valves in the inlet VE2, VE4, the chamber is pumped down and the elastic membrane is bent due to the pressure difference between vacuum and hydraulic compartments. At the same time, the control hydraulic valve VE5 is opened in the upper part of the chamber, the liquid enters the chamber under the effect of pressure difference [6]. Valves VE, VE3, VE6 are closed at this time.…”
Section: Description Of the System Design For Which The Calculation Mmentioning
confidence: 99%