2018
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A core matrisome gene signature predicts cancer outcome

Abstract: Here we identify a nine-gene ECM signature, which strongly predicts outcome across multiple cancer types and can be used for prognostication after validation in prospective cancer cohorts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
81
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…b ). This is in accordance with recent findings demonstrating that a large number of matrisome genes are expressed at significantly higher levels in CRC tissues compared to their normal counterparts …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…b ). This is in accordance with recent findings demonstrating that a large number of matrisome genes are expressed at significantly higher levels in CRC tissues compared to their normal counterparts …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in accordance with recent findings demonstrating that a large number of matrisome genes are expressed at significantly higher levels in CRC tissues compared to their normal counterparts. 14 To investigate whether CRC-HILEC-dependent modulation of the matrisome may affect tumor growth, we took advantage of a 3D in vitro model. For this scope, a microfluidic platform was designed with two parallel adjacent compartments containing cellladen 3D fibrin matrices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two matrisome-gene-based classifiers and their relevance in clinical outcomes have recently been reported [33, 34]. However, technical feasibility and clinical applicability of these gene panels have not been clearly demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a cost of degradation, [A] and [I] are reduced at maximum 1.5 unit/MCS in pixels belonging to the ‘lysed’ cell-types. Matrix regeneration is incorporated into the model by conversion of C_Lysed and L_Lysed into C1 (given that cancer cells secrete predominantly fibrillar collagen-rich matrices) after 20 MCS from the degradation event associated with that ‘lysed’ pixel (Socovich and Naba, 2018; Yuzhalin et al, 2018). The regeneration of matrix is essential to eliminate unnecessary free spaces formed as an artefact of matrix degradation which takes the computational model closer to its experimental counterpart.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%