2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49670-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cortico- Basal Ganglia Model for choosing an optimal rehabilitation strategy in Hemiparetic Stroke

Abstract: To facilitate the selection of an optimal therapy for a stroke patient with upper extremity hemiparesis, we propose a cortico-basal ganglia model capable of performing reaching tasks under normal and stroke conditions. The model contains two hemispherical systems, each organized into an outer sensory-motor cortical loop and an inner basal ganglia (BG) loop, controlling their respective hands. The model is trained to simulate two therapeutic approaches: the constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) in which th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… in Equation (8) represents the value of the current position of the arm at time ‘ t ’ and is obtained as the probabilistic gradient ascent over the value function [ 22 , 55 ] performed by the BG, as given in Equation (9) below. and are the current arm position obtained from the PC and the target goal position obtained from the PFC, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… in Equation (8) represents the value of the current position of the arm at time ‘ t ’ and is obtained as the probabilistic gradient ascent over the value function [ 22 , 55 ] performed by the BG, as given in Equation (9) below. and are the current arm position obtained from the PC and the target goal position obtained from the PFC, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output of the BG performs a stochastic hill-climbing over the value function (Chakravarthy and Moustafa, 2018 ; Narayanamurthy et al, 2019 ) and drives the MC to facilitate the arm in reaching the target. The value difference (δ V ) which is computed by comparing the current and previous values is given as,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, X targ is the target goal position, X arm is the current endeffector position of the arm, σ V is the spatial range over which the value function is sensitive for that particular target. The output of the BG performs a stochastic hill-climbing over the value function (Chakravarthy and Moustafa, 2018;Narayanamurthy et al, 2019) and drives the MC to facilitate the arm in reaching the target. The value difference (δ V ) which is computed by comparing the current and previous values is given as,…”
Section: Value Computation and Stochastic Hill Climbingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output of the BG performs a stochastic hill climbing over the value function (Chakravarthy and Moustafa, 2018;Narayanamurthy et al, 2019) and drives the MC to facilitate the arm in reaching the target. The value difference ( ) which is computed by comparing the current and previous values is given as,…”
Section: Value Computation and Stochastic Hill Climbingmentioning
confidence: 99%