A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Teaching and Learning Technology in a Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

Objective. To conduct a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of investment in teaching and learning technology (TLT) by a college of pharmacy in a large, research-intensive university in Canada. Methods. Document analysis was used to determine the goals and objectives of the university and college for TLT use. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with faculty members to understand their perspectives on the value of technology for teaching and learning, their metrics to assess value, and an estimate of social value using a willingness to pay (WTP) exercise. A CBA was used to compare the social value against the cost of the investment in TLT.Results. Twenty-one faculty members participated in semi-structured interviews. National, university, and college goals for TLT were diffuse and nonspecific in terms of the intended use or the metrics by which implementation and impacts on the quality of teaching could be assessed. The mean WTP for this technology was Can$4.38M and the cost of investment was Can$4.25M. The primary analysis showed a small positive net benefit of the investment (Can$134,456), although this difference was not significant. All dollar figures are given in Canadian dollars (CAD). Conclusion. The college's monetary investment in TLT was approximately equal to the social value placed on TLT by faculty users. Conducting a CBA on technology can bring greater understanding among faculty members of the college's curriculum and pedagogical practices as well as financial decision-making. Greater clarity about the goals and objectives for TLT could help to maximize the value of investment in this area.

Designing a Framework for the Appropriation of Information Technologies in University Teachers: A Four-Phase Approach

“…Este análisis puede incluir una evaluación de los costos de adquisición y mantenimiento de la herramienta, así como una evaluación de los beneficios educativos que se esperan obtener. (37) • Realizar un análisis de implementación: se debe considerar cómo se implementará la tecnología en el entorno universitario específico. Esto puede incluir una evaluación de la infraestructura existente, la disponibilidad de recursos, la capacitación necesaria para el personal y la compatibilidad con otros sistemas existentes.…”

The Triple-S framework: ensuring scalable, sustainable, and serviceable practices in educational technology

“…Considering serviceability will become increasingly more important as the cost of providing technology increases. It appears that in many cases, the investment in teaching and learning technology sits at an acceptable point, meeting expectations in some programs (Harrison et al, 2019). However, it is likely that future educators using more unique or non-standard online learning modules may need to justify recurring costs for the use of their desired technological intervention-something which can be challenging to perform (Krotov & Ives, 2016).…”

A Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Model for Technological Knowledge Acquisition Based on Game Theory

“…Discounted Cash Flow [69,70] Cost/Benefit Analysis [71][72][73][74] Net present value [75][76][77] Return on Investment (ROI) [78,79] AHP [80,81] Critical Success Factors [82,83] Dynamic Programming [84] Real Option models [33,[85][86][87][88] Game Theory Models [89][90][91][92][93] Acquisition Mode Discounted Cash Flow [94] Cost/Benefit Analysis [95] Net present value [96] AHP [97][98][99] Critical Success Factors [100] Real Option models [101] Game…”