2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cost comparison of fuel-cell and battery electric vehicles

Abstract: This paper compares the manufacturing and refueling costs of a Fuel-Cell Vehicle (FCV) and a Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) using an automobile model reflecting the largest segment of light-duty vehicles. We use results from widely-cited government studies to compare the manufacturing and refueling costs of a BEV and a FCV capable of delivering 135 horsepower and driving approximately 300 miles. Our results show that a BEV performs far more favorably in terms of cost, energy efficiency, weight, and volume. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
40
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
40
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be a mistake to force research to focus only on new technologies, on non-conventional resources, on renewable energies or, even worse, on illusory and misleading ideas such as the synthetic production of hydrogen fuel from water to serve as an energy carrier alternative to electricity (on hydrogen see Eaves and Eaves, 2004;Shinnar, 2003). We must invest also in research on mature technologies because small improvements in processing of large amounts of energy determine large primary energy savings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It would be a mistake to force research to focus only on new technologies, on non-conventional resources, on renewable energies or, even worse, on illusory and misleading ideas such as the synthetic production of hydrogen fuel from water to serve as an energy carrier alternative to electricity (on hydrogen see Eaves and Eaves, 2004;Shinnar, 2003). We must invest also in research on mature technologies because small improvements in processing of large amounts of energy determine large primary energy savings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As free market rules favour distributed production of electricity, improvements in current long distance and capillary distribution grids are needed to maintain stability and reliability. If zero emission transportation in cities is to be pursued, rather than wasting resources to chase the mirage of an unsustainable hydrogen economy, we should finance research on lighter and faster rechargeable batteries for hybrid and electric cars, which at comparable performance are safer, cleaner, lighter, economical and intrinsically much more energy efficient on a well-to-wheel basis than hydrogen fuel-cell cars (even in an unlikely all renewable scenario, Eaves and Eaves, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is out of the scope of this analysis to model these effects, instead we use appropriate results from the literature. Similar to [32,28,33,35] we assume an average discharge/charge efficiency of 98% for Li-ion batteries used in BEVs on the NEDC. Targets set by car and battery manufacturers for calendar and deep-cycle life are typically about 10 years and 5000 cycles, respectively.…”
Section: Energy Consumption and Influence Of Vehicle Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At modest charging levels (3 kW) an AC/DC battery charger operates with an efficiency η ch of about 92% [32,33,35]. With this the plug-to-wheel energy consumption E ptw is…”
Section: Energy Consumption and Influence Of Vehicle Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major bottlenecks to the commercialization of non-hybrid fuel cell vehicles is durability of a fuel cell stack that indirectly increases the cost [7]. Borup et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%