2016
DOI: 10.1177/1541931213601162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross-Domain Approach to Designing an Unobtrusive System to Assess Human State and Predict Upcoming Performance Deficits

Abstract: Many work environments are fraught with highly variable demands on cognitive workload, fluctuating between periods of high operational demand to the point of cognitive overload, to long periods of low workload bordering on boredom. When cognitive workload is not in an optimal range at either end of the spectrum, it can be detrimental to situational awareness and operational readiness, resulting in impaired cognitive functioning (Yerkes and Dodson, 1908). An unobtrusive system to assess the state of the human o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of avionic and contextual parameters will also allow the consolidation of the "expected good behavior" of a pilot, depending on the situation and the mission which must be performed, and hence improve the accuracy of the model. Such behavioral measures and context aware systems are deemed essential for real-world application of mental effort models and similar concepts (Elkin-Frankston et al, 2017, Bracken et al, 2016Bracken et al, , 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of avionic and contextual parameters will also allow the consolidation of the "expected good behavior" of a pilot, depending on the situation and the mission which must be performed, and hence improve the accuracy of the model. Such behavioral measures and context aware systems are deemed essential for real-world application of mental effort models and similar concepts (Elkin-Frankston et al, 2017, Bracken et al, 2016Bracken et al, , 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%