2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10643-009-0338-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dance with the Butterflies: A Metamorphosis of Teaching and Learning Through Technology

Abstract: This paper describes a web-based collaborative project called A Dance with the Butterflies that applied the brain-based research of the Center for Applied Special Technologies (CAST) and principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to Pre-K-4 science curriculum. Learning experiences were designed for students to invoke the Recognition, Strategic, and Affective neural networks for learning identified in the CAST research. Instruction was based on the Science Education content standard that all students sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with this method of inquiry, educators could train general education student tutors in scaffolding techniques or provide a set of scaffolding questions for use during inquiry learning. Integrating peer tutoring in this manner could benefit all students by (a) creating a partnership where students work together and contribute equally in heterogeneous inquiry-based activities and the burden of all the work does not fall on one student (White & Frederiksen, 1998), (b) enabling the teacher to provide more time to assist student partnerships based on their levels of need (Menesses & Gresham, 2009), and (c) permitting teachers to assess student knowledge of science concepts through systematic ongoing performance assessments (McPherson, 2009). Because structured inquiry intends to provide scaffolding to guide students’ initial acquisition of content and then fade supports as necessary (Scruggs, Mastropieri, & Boon, 1998), using peer tutoring during inquiry would allow the gradual release of student support to accommodate the diversity of students in general education classrooms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this method of inquiry, educators could train general education student tutors in scaffolding techniques or provide a set of scaffolding questions for use during inquiry learning. Integrating peer tutoring in this manner could benefit all students by (a) creating a partnership where students work together and contribute equally in heterogeneous inquiry-based activities and the burden of all the work does not fall on one student (White & Frederiksen, 1998), (b) enabling the teacher to provide more time to assist student partnerships based on their levels of need (Menesses & Gresham, 2009), and (c) permitting teachers to assess student knowledge of science concepts through systematic ongoing performance assessments (McPherson, 2009). Because structured inquiry intends to provide scaffolding to guide students’ initial acquisition of content and then fade supports as necessary (Scruggs, Mastropieri, & Boon, 1998), using peer tutoring during inquiry would allow the gradual release of student support to accommodate the diversity of students in general education classrooms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, many authors have called for educators’ use of UDL techniques so that students with diverse learning needs are taught in educational environments designed to proactively design and deliver instruction responsive to students’ variable needs (cf. Jimenez, Graf, & Rose, 2007; King-Sears, 2001, 2009; McPherson, 2009; Pisha & Coyne, 2001; Stanford & Reeves, 2009; Zhang, 2005). Admittedly, there is widespread intuitive appeal that UDL techniques can promote learning for students with HID, particularly for techniques that can potentially increase students’ access to, and subsequent performance in, the general education curriculum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a wider literature too that, without engaging the notion of affordance, emphasises the potential of iPad technology to represent knowledge in innovative and multimodal ways (e.g. Clark & Luckin 2013;McPherson 2009;Nikolopoulou 2007;Ntuli & Kyei-Blankson 2010). However, there is also evidence that teachers prefer the bigger screens of older devices like desktop computers or laptops when it comes to composing long texts or creating multimedia artefacts (Chinnery 2006;Pegrum, Howitt & Stripes 2013).…”
Section: Literature Review Pedagogical Affordances Of Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%