2020
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2020.2969944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Data-Driven Approach to Prediction and Optimal Bucket-Filling Control for Autonomous Excavators

Abstract: We develop a data-driven, statistical control method for autonomous excavators. Interactions between soil and an excavator bucket are highly complex and nonlinear, making traditional physical modeling difficult to use for realtime control. Here, we propose a data-driven method, exploiting data obtained from laboratory tests. We use the data to construct a nonlinear, non-parametric statistical model for predicting the behavior of soil scooped by an excavator bucket. The prediction model is built for controlling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Excavation Planning and Learning: The majority of prior work on excavation automation explores the excavation of homogeneous materials such as soil and sand. Here we review literature on soil and sand excavation first, which could be roughly grouped into 1) control of hydraulic earthmoving machines [3,[15][16][17]; 2) trajectory-level planning [4,18]; 3) task-level planning and excavation system engineering [2,[19][20][21]. There have have been a relatively small amount of works that focus on rigid objects excavation, partly because of the complex, stochastic nature of contact dynamics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Excavation Planning and Learning: The majority of prior work on excavation automation explores the excavation of homogeneous materials such as soil and sand. Here we review literature on soil and sand excavation first, which could be roughly grouped into 1) control of hydraulic earthmoving machines [3,[15][16][17]; 2) trajectory-level planning [4,18]; 3) task-level planning and excavation system engineering [2,[19][20][21]. There have have been a relatively small amount of works that focus on rigid objects excavation, partly because of the complex, stochastic nature of contact dynamics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A S an integral part of construction, mining, and various other important engineering fields, excavator operation requires skilled workers and often needs to be operated in extreme outdoor conditions that lead to injuries [1]. There have been an increasing amount of research efforts in excavation automation [2][3][4]. However, the majority of the literature only considers the excavation of homogeneous granular materials such as soil and sand, and the excavation of irregular rigid objects such as fragmented rocks is not as explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the parameters of Q-learning in source tasks are partially transferred to the Q-learning of target tasks to demonstrate the transfer learning capability of the proposed approach. Considering the nonlinearity and complexity of interactions between the bucket and pile [7], the data obtained from field tests are utilized to build a nonlinear, non-parametric statistical model for predicting the state of the loader bucket in the bucket-filling process. The prediction model is used to train the Q-learning algorithm to validate the proposed algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data-driven approach makes it possible to deal with the complex machinery dynamics [19][20][21][22] et al used the data collected from tests to construct a nonlinear, nonparametric statistical model to predict the behavior of soil excavated by an excavator bucket. Heteroscedastic Gaussian process regression is used as the prediction framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%