2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A data driven typology of electric vehicle user types and charging sessions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other works have utilized unsupervised learning, mainly clustering techniques to identify EV charging behavior. GMM was used in [70] to find 13 distinct clusters of charging behavior for non-residential charging. Charging sessions containing information about start time, connection duration, distance between two sessions and hours between sessions were considered as features.…”
Section: Unsupervised and Statistical Learning For Analysis And Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works have utilized unsupervised learning, mainly clustering techniques to identify EV charging behavior. GMM was used in [70] to find 13 distinct clusters of charging behavior for non-residential charging. Charging sessions containing information about start time, connection duration, distance between two sessions and hours between sessions were considered as features.…”
Section: Unsupervised and Statistical Learning For Analysis And Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the observations that weekly charging sessions present two peaks (namely a morning and a late afternoon peak) it was reasonable to consider a mixture of distributions to account for the different modes. In [133], 13 different charging session profiles were identified using Gaussian mixture clustering based on data provided by the G4 cities of the Netherlands. Other recent studies complement this work by using Gaussian mixtures to model the triplet (arrival time, charging duration, energy consumed) in order to characterize EV load.…”
Section: Statistical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, statistical characterization techniques with unimodal distributions could yield a sufficient approximation of the phenomenon as proposed in [13,14] along with LM [148][149][150]. The remaining statistical characterization models (mixtures [13,24,123,133,134] and KDEs [135][136][137][138][139]) can capture diverse patterns and thus could be applied to medium-sized datasets. The Paris dataset could also be used to ver-ify the consistency of simple queuing models as they usually struggle to find concrete applications [29,142].…”
Section: Suggested Matching Of Ev Load Models With the Datasets Consideredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), unsupervised learning methods (e.g. clustering [13], Gaussian mixture models [14], and kernel density estimator [15]), and deep learning [16]. Deterministic models, providing scalar predictions, dominate, while the probabilistic models have not received the same attention [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%