2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decision support system for optimizing the conversion of rotation forest stands to continuous cover forest stands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three management strategies and an unmanaged control variant were investigated over a time horizon of 100 years. The simulated strategies were designed to reflect alternative silvicultural treatments currently discussed in practical forestry (e.g., Reininger, 2000) as well as in the scientific literature (Spiecker et al, 2004;Knoche, 2005;Knoke et al, 2005;Loewenstein, 2005;Rojo and Orois, 2005), besides the business as usual strategy (MS1) and a do-nothing control variant (MS4). As such, the study did not search for a management strategy with maximum C sequestration but rather investigated selected silvicultural strategies with regard to their C sequestration capacity over a period of 100 years and analyzed the trade-offs with regard to timber production and key indicators of biodiversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three management strategies and an unmanaged control variant were investigated over a time horizon of 100 years. The simulated strategies were designed to reflect alternative silvicultural treatments currently discussed in practical forestry (e.g., Reininger, 2000) as well as in the scientific literature (Spiecker et al, 2004;Knoche, 2005;Knoke et al, 2005;Loewenstein, 2005;Rojo and Orois, 2005), besides the business as usual strategy (MS1) and a do-nothing control variant (MS4). As such, the study did not search for a management strategy with maximum C sequestration but rather investigated selected silvicultural strategies with regard to their C sequestration capacity over a period of 100 years and analyzed the trade-offs with regard to timber production and key indicators of biodiversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, conifers have been successfully planted within fast‐growing, hybrid poplar stands (Park and Wilson 2007), emulating the way spruce naturally grows beneath pioneer aspen stands in boreal forests. With care and careful planning, these stands can be harvested in multiple steps instead of the traditional single‐cut operation, thereby supporting permanent forest cover (Rojo and Orois 2005).…”
Section: The Need For More Complex Multi‐purpose Plantationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Many subscribe to the general concepts of ecosystem management and continuous cover forestry, as a response to criticisms of forest overexploitation, monocultures, and clear-cuts in particular (Rowe 1992, Kenk and Guehne 2001, Rojo and Orois 2005. The methods associated with these concepts have the potential to achieve the objectives of sustainable development described in the Rio/Helsinki accords and of the certification of forest products (Pommerening and Murphy 2004), although these objectives of acceptability of forest practices are explicitly stated only in the boreal and coastal temperate forest literature ( Fig.…”
Section: Shelterwoods: Common and Specific Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%