A decision tree model to estimate the value of information provided by a groundwater quality monitoring network

Abstract

Abstract. Groundwater contaminated with nitrate poses a serious health risk to infants when this contaminated water is used for culinary purposes. To avoid this health risk, people need to know whether their culinary water is contaminated or not. Therefore, there is a need to design an effective groundwater monitoring network, acquire information on groundwater conditions, and use acquired information to inform management options. These actions require time, money, and effort. This paper presents a method to estimate the value of information (VOI) provided by a groundwater quality monitoring network located in an aquifer whose water poses a spatially heterogeneous and uncertain health risk. A decision tree model describes the structure of the decision alternatives facing the decision-maker and the expected outcomes from these alternatives. The alternatives include (i) ignore the health risk of nitrate-contaminated water, (ii) switch to alternative water sources such as bottled water, or (iii) implement a previously designed groundwater quality monitoring network that takes into account uncertainties in aquifer properties, contaminant transport processes, and climate (Khader, 2012). The VOI is estimated as the difference between the expected costs of implementing the monitoring network and the lowest-cost uninformed alternative. We illustrate the method for the Eocene Aquifer, West Bank, Palestine, where methemoglobinemia (blue baby syndrome) is the main health problem associated with the principal contaminant nitrate. The expected cost of each alternative is estimated as the weighted sum of the costs and probabilities (likelihoods) associated with the uncertain outcomes resulting from the alternative. Uncertain outcomes include actual nitrate concentrations in the aquifer, concentrations reported by the monitoring system, whether people abide by manager recommendations to use/not use aquifer water, and whether people get sick from drinking contaminated water. Outcome costs include healthcare for methemoglobinemia, purchase of bottled water, and installation and maintenance of the groundwater monitoring system. At current methemoglobinemia and bottled water costs of $ 150/person and $ 0.6/baby/day, the decision tree results show that the expected cost of establishing the proposed groundwater quality monitoring network exceeds the expected costs of the uninformed alternatives and there is no value to the information the monitoring system provides. However, the monitoring system will be preferred to ignoring the health risk or using alternative sources if the methemoglobinemia cost rises to $ 300/person or the bottled water cost increases to $ 2.3/baby/day. Similarly, the monitoring system has value if the system can more accurately report actual aquifer concentrations and the public more fully abides by manager recommendations to use/not use the aquifer. The system also has value if it will serve a larger population or if its installation costs can be reduced, for example using a smaller number of monitoring wells...

Rainfall and streamflow sensor network design: a review of applications, classification, and a proposed framework

“…The design of a sensor network uses the same concepts as experimental design (Kiefer and Wolfowitz, 1959;Fisher, 1974). The design should ensure that the data are sufficient and representative, and can be used to derive the conclusions required from the measurements (EPA, 2002), or to assess the water status of a river system (EC, 2000).…”

“…Following the same line of ideas, Khader et al (2013) proposed the use of decision trees to account for the development of a sensor network for water quality in drinking groundwater applications. VOI is a straightforward methodology to establish present causes and consequences of scenarios with different types of actions, including the expected effect of additional information.…”

Probabilistic Flood Maps to support decision‐making: Mapping the Value of Information

“…Khader et al . [] developed a method to estimate the VOI of a groundwater monitoring network for an aquifer with spatial heterogeneity for health risk using decision trees.…”

A vulnerability driven approach to identify adverse climate and land use change combinations for critical hydrologic indicator thresholds: Application to a watershed in Pennsylvania, USA

“…However, PRIM is generally employed when the output space is partitioned in two possibilities-vulnerable or nonvulnerable. Other example applications of these alternative approaches include risk-based decision making to characterize contaminant plumes by Boso et al [2013], and the use of decision tree models for estimating the value of information provided by a groundwater quality monitoring network by Khader et al [2013].…”