2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-011-9983-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A describing function approach to the design of robust limit-cycle controllers

Abstract: The design of robust limit-cycle controllers is introduced for autonomous systems with separable SISO nonlinearities. The objective is to design a controller to secure specified robust oscillation amplitude and frequency. The method consists of quasilinearization of the nonlinear element via a Describing Function (DF) approach and then shaping the loop to reach desired limit-cycle characteristics. As the DF method is used, loop shaping takes place in the Nyquist plot. An example is given to illustrate the robu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach for analysis of nonlinear systems is easily found in several classic books [Ogata, 1970;Slotine & Li, 1991;Khalil, 1996;Glad & Ljung, 2000], consisting of an extension of linear techniques based on the concepts of the frequency response in order to verify effects of certain nonlinearities on a feedback dynamic system. The analysis by describing functions allows to predict stability and the possible existence of limit cycles [Ogata, 1970;Oliveira et al, 2012] and chaotic behavior, which can be interpreted as an interaction between limit cycles and equilibrium points [Genesio & Tesi, 1991;Neymeyr & Seelig, 1991;Genesio & Tesi, 1992;Savacı & Günel, 2006]. The transfer function of the linear part of Chua's circuit between the output x and the input u (see Fig.…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach for analysis of nonlinear systems is easily found in several classic books [Ogata, 1970;Slotine & Li, 1991;Khalil, 1996;Glad & Ljung, 2000], consisting of an extension of linear techniques based on the concepts of the frequency response in order to verify effects of certain nonlinearities on a feedback dynamic system. The analysis by describing functions allows to predict stability and the possible existence of limit cycles [Ogata, 1970;Oliveira et al, 2012] and chaotic behavior, which can be interpreted as an interaction between limit cycles and equilibrium points [Genesio & Tesi, 1991;Neymeyr & Seelig, 1991;Genesio & Tesi, 1992;Savacı & Günel, 2006]. The transfer function of the linear part of Chua's circuit between the output x and the input u (see Fig.…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the Lyapunov method and Poincare maps, the describing function (DF) method provides a relatively simple and efficient solution for the oscillation in the nonlinear control algorithm [14,15]. For the SM algorithm, the DF method and Routh Criterion were employed to predict the stability of oscillations in the uncertain SM system [16]. Its robustness could be tuned by the intersection angle between the Nyquist plot of the plant and the negative reciprocal DF of controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the oscillation in a second-order SM controller could be set by parameter tuning under the guidance of the DF method [12]. The traditional DF method is effective for these uncoupled nonlinearities in [12,16,17], which only depends on the amplitude of oscillations. However, the SM algorithm may depend on both the amplitude and frequency of oscillations with the increase of complexity of controllers, and it is hard for the traditional DF method to analyze the coupled nonlinearity in SM controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is also a proper tool to characterize limit cycle behaviors by modeling nonlinear systems in the frequency domain. The robustness of the SM system has been improved by adjusting the intersection angle of curves of G(s) and −1/N (A) guided by the traditional DF approach [17]. The influences of a variety of switching functions on the limit cycle and its stability in SM systems were studied by the DF approach [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%