2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A different type of indentation size effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
132
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
22
132
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The MAX obtained using the blunt indenter is much smaller, only about 43 % of that from the sharp indenter. This difference in MAX is consistent with nanoindentation size effects reported by other researchers Shim et al, 2008). In those studies, the maximum shear stress under small spherical indenters at the first pop-in was found to be very high, on the order of the theoretical strength; for larger spheres, the maximum stress decreased with increasing indenter radius.…”
Section: Nanoindentation Experimentssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The MAX obtained using the blunt indenter is much smaller, only about 43 % of that from the sharp indenter. This difference in MAX is consistent with nanoindentation size effects reported by other researchers Shim et al, 2008). In those studies, the maximum shear stress under small spherical indenters at the first pop-in was found to be very high, on the order of the theoretical strength; for larger spheres, the maximum stress decreased with increasing indenter radius.…”
Section: Nanoindentation Experimentssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Figure 6d shows the stress-strain curves for SiC-6H(0001) extracted using the flow stress and characteristic strain values obtained from a combination of experimental indentation hardness values and FEA simulations using equivalent cones. The results from the FEA analysis shown in Figure 6d show similar trends to the results obtained by Shim et al [44] but the values of the Holloman fit exponents (n and K) and the yield strength are different due to the difference in the values of the modulus and hardness used by Shim et al [44]. The yield strength is estimated to be 6.2-8 GPa, which agrees with previous literature [4,41].…”
Section: Extraction Of Flow Propertiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…[44] shown schematically in Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials, was used to perform FEA simulations to estimate the flow properties of SiC-6H in the <0001> direction. The friction coefficients of 0 and 0.2 were chosen to represent the ideal frictionless case and the realistic case for SiC-6H, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plastic deformation in nanoscale volumes of materials often exhibits a stochastic, discontinuous character, in contrast to the typical smooth yield behavior in their bulk counterparts [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Such jerky behavior has been attributed to the instability of microscopic defect processes, such as dislocation nucleation or depinning in crystalline metals [8,9], phase transformation in semiconductors [10] and localized shear transformation in amorphous metals [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%