1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1984.tb00720.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Digital Linear Filter for Resistivity Sounding With a Generalized Electrode Array*

Abstract: This paper presents a digital linear filter which maps composite resistivity transforms to apparent resistivities for any four-electrode array over a horizontally layered earth. A filter is provided for each of three sampling rates; the choice of filter will depend on resistivity contrasts and computational facilities.Two methods of filter design are compared. The Wiener-Hopf least-squares method is preferable for low sampling rate filters. The Fourier transform method is more successful in producing a filter … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Relevant data were acquired with a VES (Vertical Electrical Sounding) technique, using a Schlumberger electrode array and an ABEM Terrameter SAS 300. The resulting apparent resistivity curves were interpreted by a computer program based on the linear digital filtering method (Koefoed, 1972(Koefoed, , 1979O'Neill and Merrick, 1984). Current software packages based on this approach are able to cope with extreme apparent resistivity contrasts and to deal with a large number of layers.…”
Section: Geophysical Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant data were acquired with a VES (Vertical Electrical Sounding) technique, using a Schlumberger electrode array and an ABEM Terrameter SAS 300. The resulting apparent resistivity curves were interpreted by a computer program based on the linear digital filtering method (Koefoed, 1972(Koefoed, , 1979O'Neill and Merrick, 1984). Current software packages based on this approach are able to cope with extreme apparent resistivity contrasts and to deal with a large number of layers.…”
Section: Geophysical Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test models are a three‐layered earth, a 2‐D vertical contact and a 3‐D buried conductive cubic body. Analytical solutions are available for the first two models (Fu 1983; O'Neill & Merrick 1984). The potential is computed using the total potential finite‐element (TP‐FE) method and by the secondary potential finite‐element (SP‐FE) method, respectively, and then compared with the analytical solution to evaluate the accuracy of the SP‐FE method in this study.…”
Section: Numerical Examples and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Ardau (1995) and interpreted the vertical electrical soundings in a merely qualitative way, we reprocessed the data using computer software based on the linear digital filtering method (e.g., Koefoed, 1972Koefoed, , 1979O'Neill and Merrick, 1984). As is well known, modern software packages based on this method can cope with even extreme resistivity contrasts and deal with a large number of layers.…”
Section: Reprocessing Of Ves Datamentioning
confidence: 99%