A dilemma for developing countries in intellectual property strategy? Lessons from a case study of software piracy and Microsoft in China

Abstract

This paper examines the dilemmas faced by developing countries (DCs) in determining their response to the global harmonisation of intellectual property (IP) protection. It focuses on two key questions: will a weak IP regime in DCs deter inward investment/technology transfer and hamper technology development?; and can DCs build up their technology capabilities and thereby overcome the projected negative impacts of global IP harmonisation by a strategy of delaying compliance with the international IP regime? This paper reviews these debates and dilemmas, applying an analytical framework based on technology studies. It uses a case study of the software industry in China to advance the argument that the effects of an IP regime are extremely complex, depending on particular industrial, technological and social factors. The key question is not whether to enforce the global IP regime; rather, policymaking needs to be informed by a more detailed approach. Imposition of the global IP regime may not be effective and may not per se promote innovation.

The development of market orientation: a consideration of institutional influence in China

“…In the information technology industry, for instance, compare India's National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM) and its Chinese counterpart, China Software Industry Association (CSIA). Compared to NASSCOM, CSIA has played relatively insignificant role in transforming structure and practices of Chinese software companies (Shen, 2005). It can thus be argued that professional organizations related to marketing such as China Marketing Research Association tend to play only a minor role in shaping Chinese firms" market orientation.…”

Professional and trade associations in a nascent and formative sector of a developing economy: A case study of the NASSCOM effect on the Indian offshoring industry

“…Chinese government's control arguably is a major obstacle to the autonomy and growth of associations in the country (Dickson, 2003;Frankel, 2006). Compared to NASSCOM, CSIA has thus played a relatively minor role in transforming structure and practices of Chinese companies (Shen, 2005).…”

Les activités d’espionnage électronique et de contrôle d’Internet à l’ère de l’infonuagique : le cas de la Chine

“…En Chine, les groupes d'intérêts particuliers et les organisations non gouvernementales sont faiblement organisés (Li, Lin et Xia, 2004) et ils ont peu de marge de manoeuvre pour influencer la législation nationale (Su et Yang, 2000) et transformer les structures et les pratiques au sein des entreprises locales (Shen, 2005). Il est également important de différencier les mesures de sécurité Internet des sociétés privées chinoises de celles d'autres pays.…”