2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1889(01)00070-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A DNS-curve in a two-state capital accumulation model: a numerical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following problem from Haunschmied et al (2003) is a 2d variant of an investment problem of the firm where the control variable is the change of investment rather than investment itself as in the usual case. The payoff function is here given by…”
Section: A 2d Model With Multiple Domains Of Attractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following problem from Haunschmied et al (2003) is a 2d variant of an investment problem of the firm where the control variable is the change of investment rather than investment itself as in the usual case. The payoff function is here given by…”
Section: A 2d Model With Multiple Domains Of Attractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vector field shows that there is a bifurcation of the dynamics, where the trajectories go either to the low level steady state or high level steady states. This bifurcation line has been called a Skiba curve in Haunschmied et al (2003). The above vector field was generated by DP 19 and serves as a benchmark for assessing the quality of the NMPC solutions.…”
Section: Figure 53: Vector Field Of the Model With Multiple Attractorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 For the latter see Bréchet et al (2012) 7 See Feichtinger et al (2001) and Haunschmied et al (2003). 8 In the latter type of models a convex-concave production function arises which leads to thresholds separating paths to low per capita income (poor) countries and high per capita income (rich) countries, see Skiba (1978) and Azariadis and Drazen (1990).…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the mild recession case, an additional steady state  II ,p II arises, which results in history dependent behavior, as illustrated in Figure 5. In particular,  II ,p II acts as a weak Skiba point (see, e.g., Grass et al, 2008;Caulkins et al, 2007;Haunschmied et al, 2003) , below which reputation and hence demand is so low that the firm acts as if the recession is severe, and above which reputation and hence demand is so high that the firm acts as if the recession is mild. If the brand image exceeds II , the optimal trajectories always converge to the steady state I in a monotonic way, so the firm lives on forever and bankruptcy never occurs.…”
Section: Intermediate Recessionmentioning
confidence: 99%