2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.928807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dual-Band Model for the Vertical Distribution of Photosynthetically Available Radiation (PAR) in Stratified Waters

Abstract: Based on the optical properties of water constituents, the vertical variation of photosynthetically available radiation (PAR) can be well modeled with hyperspectral resolution; the intensive computing load, however, demands simplified modeling that can be easily embedded in marine physical and biogeochemical models. While the vertical PAR profile in homogeneous waters can now be accurately modeled with simple parameterization, it is still a big challenge to model the PAR profile in stratified waters with limit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure includes three steps: PAR sat was divided by the daytime length (DL, in hours), and multiplied by the transmission coefficient ( α ) which converts radiation from “above sea surface” into “below sea surface” (PAR 0 ): PAR0=α×PARsat/DL ${\text{PAR}}_{0}=\alpha \times {\text{PAR}}_{\text{sat}}/\text{DL}$ Here, the coefficient α was provided by Mobley and Boss (2012). The PAR profile in the mixed layer (PAR( z )) was estimated from PAR 0 anddiffuse attenuation coefficient K d (490), based on the USRGR model (Xing et al., 2022), which first decomposes PAR 0 into two bands, the Useable Solar Radiation (USR) band (400–560 nm) and Green‐to‐Red (GR) band (560–700 nm), and then attenuates the two‐band radiations (Equation ), based on respective empirical relationships (Equations and ): PAR(z)=USR(z)+GR(z)=PAR0·[]β·exp()Kd(USR)·z+(1β)exp()Kd(GR,z)z $\text{PAR}(z)=\text{USR}(z)+\text{GR}(z)={\text{PAR}}_{0}\cdot \left[\beta \cdot \mathrm{exp}\left(-{K}_{d}(\text{USR})\cdot z\right)+(1-\beta )\cdot \mathrm{exp}\left(-{K}_{d}(\text{GR},z)\cdot z\right)\right]$ Kd(USR)={0.91·Kd(490)0.89()Kd(490)0.10.0062+1.16·Kd(490)0.00018/Kd(490)()Kd(490)<0.1 ${K}_{d}(\text{USR})=\left\{\begin{array}{@{}cc@{}}0.91\cdot {K}_{d}{(490)}^{0.89}& \left({K}_{d}(490)\ge 0.1\right)\\ 0.0062+1.16\cdot {K}_{d}(490)-0.00018/{K}_{d}(490)& \left({K}_{d}(490)< 0.1\right)\end{array}\right.$ …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The procedure includes three steps: PAR sat was divided by the daytime length (DL, in hours), and multiplied by the transmission coefficient ( α ) which converts radiation from “above sea surface” into “below sea surface” (PAR 0 ): PAR0=α×PARsat/DL ${\text{PAR}}_{0}=\alpha \times {\text{PAR}}_{\text{sat}}/\text{DL}$ Here, the coefficient α was provided by Mobley and Boss (2012). The PAR profile in the mixed layer (PAR( z )) was estimated from PAR 0 anddiffuse attenuation coefficient K d (490), based on the USRGR model (Xing et al., 2022), which first decomposes PAR 0 into two bands, the Useable Solar Radiation (USR) band (400–560 nm) and Green‐to‐Red (GR) band (560–700 nm), and then attenuates the two‐band radiations (Equation ), based on respective empirical relationships (Equations and ): PAR(z)=USR(z)+GR(z)=PAR0·[]β·exp()Kd(USR)·z+(1β)exp()Kd(GR,z)z $\text{PAR}(z)=\text{USR}(z)+\text{GR}(z)={\text{PAR}}_{0}\cdot \left[\beta \cdot \mathrm{exp}\left(-{K}_{d}(\text{USR})\cdot z\right)+(1-\beta )\cdot \mathrm{exp}\left(-{K}_{d}(\text{GR},z)\cdot z\right)\right]$ Kd(USR)={0.91·Kd(490)0.89()Kd(490)0.10.0062+1.16·Kd(490)0.00018/Kd(490)()Kd(490)<0.1 ${K}_{d}(\text{USR})=\left\{\begin{array}{@{}cc@{}}0.91\cdot {K}_{d}{(490)}^{0.89}& \left({K}_{d}(490)\ge 0.1\right)\\ 0.0062+1.16\cdot {K}_{d}(490)-0.00018/{K}_{d}(490)& \left({K}_{d}(490)< 0.1\right)\end{array}\right.$ …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PAR profile in the mixed layer (PAR( z )) was estimated from PAR 0 anddiffuse attenuation coefficient K d (490), based on the USRGR model (Xing et al., 2022), which first decomposes PAR 0 into two bands, the Useable Solar Radiation (USR) band (400–560 nm) and Green‐to‐Red (GR) band (560–700 nm), and then attenuates the two‐band radiations (Equation ), based on respective empirical relationships (Equations and ): PAR(z)=USR(z)+GR(z)=PAR0·[]β·exp()Kd(USR)·z+(1β)exp()Kd(GR,z)z $\text{PAR}(z)=\text{USR}(z)+\text{GR}(z)={\text{PAR}}_{0}\cdot \left[\beta \cdot \mathrm{exp}\left(-{K}_{d}(\text{USR})\cdot z\right)+(1-\beta )\cdot \mathrm{exp}\left(-{K}_{d}(\text{GR},z)\cdot z\right)\right]$ Kd(USR)={0.91·Kd(490)0.89()Kd(490)0.10.0062+1.16·Kd(490)0.00018/Kd(490)()Kd(490)<0.1 ${K}_{d}(\text{USR})=\left\{\begin{array}{@{}cc@{}}0.91\cdot {K}_{d}{(490)}^{0.89}& \left({K}_{d}(490)\ge 0.1\right)\\ 0.0062+1.16\cdot {K}_{d}(490)-0.00018/{K}_{d}(490)& \left({K}_{d}(490)< 0.1\right)\end{array}\right.$ Kd(GR,z)=()0.1+0.79·Kd(490)+()0.210.23·Kd(490)exp(0.082·z) ${K}_{d}(\text{GR},z)=\left(0.1+0.79\cdot {K}_{d}(490)\right)+\left(0.21-0.23\cdot {K}_{d}(490)\right)\mathrm{exp}(-0.082\cdot z)$...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We estimated the daily PAR profile from the sea‐surface PAR (PAR 0 ) and the quality‐controlled chlorophyll profile by using the USRGR model (Xing et al., 2022), which is a semi‐analytical PAR model that decomposes visible light into two bands, the Useable Solar Radiation band (USR, 400–560 nm) and the Green‐to‐Red band (GR, 560–700 nm). The chlorophyll profiles were used to parametrize the vertical attenuation of USR and GR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, PAR has a rapid attenuation in the mixed layer. Therefore, we applied the USRGR model of Xing et al (2022) to combine with the monthly diffuse attenuation coefficient at 490nm (Kd490) from MODIS-Aqua sensor and MLD data from BOA-Argo, to calculate the averaged PAR in the MLD (PARg, Figure 3C), aiming at illustrating the effect of PAR in the mixed layer in our model.…”
Section: The Effect Of Light Changes In the Mixed Layer In The Regres...mentioning
confidence: 99%