2016 18th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/synasc.2016.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Duality-Aware Calculus for Quantified Boolean Formulas

Abstract: Learning and backjumping are essential features in search-based decision procedures for Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF). To obtain a better understanding of such procedures, we present a formal framework, which allows to simultaneously reason on prenex conjunctive and disjunctive normal form. It captures both satisfying and falsifying search states in a symmetric way. This symmetry simplifies the framework and offers potential for further variants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A totally different approach, inspired by [13,10], was presented in [3,20]. It is dual, i.e., it takes as input a formula together with its negation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A totally different approach, inspired by [13,10], was presented in [3,20]. It is dual, i.e., it takes as input a formula together with its negation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approaches differ in that QCDCL does not reason about functions, but only about values of variables. Fazekas et al have formalized QCDCL as inference rules [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related work. This work is written in the tradition of works such as the Model Evolution Calculus [13], AbstractDPLL [14], MCSAT [15], and recent calculi for QBF [16], which present search algorithms as inference rules to enable the study and extension of these algorithms. ID and the inference rules presented in this paper can be seen as an instantiation of the more general frameworks, such as MCSAT [15] or Abstract Conflict Driven Learning [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%