A Family Resemblance? The Regulation of Marriage Migration in Europe

Abstract

Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University's research available electronically.Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge.Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s).Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author's name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pagination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award.If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address:eprints@mdx.ac.ukThe item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated. Introduction: The Problem of Marriage MigrationIn Europe, as elsewhere, many states find migration through marriage or equivalent relationship particularly problematic. Reconciling the desire to limit immigration, at least by certain types of immigrant, with responsibilities to citizens who engage in transnational family life is a major preoccupation. Unlike labour migration, the admission of family members is a function of the citizenship rights of those already within the state which cannot, in a liberal democracy, be denied recognition.National laws thus provide for the admission of family members even when opportunities for labour migration have closed and family,including spousal, migration is now the dominant form of entry into many European states, representing around one half of legal migration into the EU in the early 2000s and one third in 2011. 1 States cannot easily select this large group of migrants for skills, education, cultural similarity or the other criteria applied to labour migrants but a trend towards greater restrictiveness has been observed in a number of states dating back to 1980.2 Family migration is also the site of tension between supra-national and domestic legal systems although it is not immediately obvious why this should be. Supra-national legal norms generally exist * The support of the Nuffield Foundation for the research discussed in this article is gratefully acknowledged. This article is concerned with similarity in national regimes of spousal migration.It is a snapshot not a convergence study and does not look at increasing similarity over time. The main explanatory frameworks for conver...

538. Amores en el registro. Mecanismos institucionales de gestión del ‘amor verdadero’ en los matrimonios binacionales

“…42 La migración de familia ha sido la forma legal predominante de entrada a Europa en las últimas décadas, aunque es cada vez más controvertida. Los debates políticos recientes enfocan tres cuestiones como justificación para restringir la migración de familia: (1) los matrimonios de conveniencia; (2) los matrimonios forzados, y (3) la integración (Kraler, 2010, p.40;Wray 2011, p.247;Wray et al 2014). 43 Eggebø 2013, p.773; Lejeune 2013, p.139; Red Europea de Migraciones 2012, p.24.…”

Spatial variation in non-marital fertility across Europe: recent trends, past path dependencies, and potential future pathways

“…Members of these groups tend to have a lower tendency to give birth to a child outside of marriage (see, e.g., Klüsener and Goldstein, 2014, for Germany). This is not only linked to the fact, that migrants in Europe are frequently from regions of origin in which more conservative social norms regarding family formation behaviour are prevalent, but also because family reunion migration is facilitated by some European countries if a couple is married (for an overview, see Wray et al, 2014). Moreover, the social values of individuals might affect their migration decisions.…”

Contesting categories: cross-border marriages from the perspectives of the state, spouses and researchers

“…1 Obviously, this trend is related to European countries' introduction of highly selective migration policies, which are based on skills (and asylum) and deter the migration of most third-country nationals (de Haas, Natter, and Vezzoli 2018). Family migration is one of the few remaining channels for those who do not fit into the privileged categories of mobility, and some states have reacted by introducing a number of measures to restrict migration through marriage, including stricter income, age and language requirements (Wray, Agoston, and Hutton 2014;Block 2016).…”