2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2009.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A field study of corporate employee monitoring: Attitudes, absenteeism, and the moderating influences of procedural justice perceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we can hear echoes of Workman who found workers were less likely to object to monitoring if they felt themselves especially vulnerable [36]. The difference here is the drivers perceive the city and not themselves to be in need of extra caution and invigilation.…”
Section: Surveillance and Controlmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here we can hear echoes of Workman who found workers were less likely to object to monitoring if they felt themselves especially vulnerable [36]. The difference here is the drivers perceive the city and not themselves to be in need of extra caution and invigilation.…”
Section: Surveillance and Controlmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…When more stringent systems are introduced for top-down performance monitoring [22,29,36] workers often report concerns about privacy and invasiveness [38,39]. Even when privacy principles can be established and upheld, resistance to LBS monitoring is strong [39].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, we assume that employees actually behave in a more desirable way when they know that their actions are monitored by the bank. Previous research on monitoring confirmed that vulnerability or severity may affect individual attitudes toward monitoring [35]. Hence, we also aim at unraveling the influence on monitoring on the actual behavioral outcomes of these behavioral intentions in the ISP context of our study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In terms of LBS, one system developed to monitor employee interaction with colleagues suggested that even with privacy principles adhered to, acceptance of monitoring was limited (Zweig & Webster, 2003). In a study of 387 employees in the US, UK and India, attitudes towards workplace monitoring were also found to be unfavourable (Workman, 2009). However, those who had greater perceptions of vulnerability, more self-efficacy and greater levels of trust 'were more amenable to monitoring' (p.229).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%