2010 International Symposium on Information Technology 2010
DOI: 10.1109/itsim.2010.5561454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for building multilingual ontologies for Islamic portal

Abstract: In recent years, there were a variety of difficulti es that users have to face in searching for information through Internet. Past research had shown that in performing searches, users use query terms that consist of "everyday language, technical terms (with or without knowledge of underlying concepts) and various explanatory model, all influenced by psychosocial and cultural variations. Semantically annotated documents provide several advantages. One advantage is document specific representations no longer af… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To comply with this requirement for a better relevance ranking, a database or IRS should contain highly specific index terms (Ismail et al, 2000) or thesaurus (Feldvari, 2005;Sato, 2007). However, Index Islamicus is one of the oldest databases which started in 1958 covering the publications from 1906 and uses some controlled index terms in Islamic domain through ProQuest after the Library of Congress Subject Heading (LCSH) (Salim et al, 2010). The ranking mechanism of retrieved result of this database works in two ways:…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To comply with this requirement for a better relevance ranking, a database or IRS should contain highly specific index terms (Ismail et al, 2000) or thesaurus (Feldvari, 2005;Sato, 2007). However, Index Islamicus is one of the oldest databases which started in 1958 covering the publications from 1906 and uses some controlled index terms in Islamic domain through ProQuest after the Library of Congress Subject Heading (LCSH) (Salim et al, 2010). The ranking mechanism of retrieved result of this database works in two ways:…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through all the reviews, it is perceived that the IRS is important in aspects of storing information and documents as well as retrieving precise results. But no evaluation method was found to have been generated on any Islamic database's performance on retrieving Islamic works and publications like what was done on Microsoft office applications by Chatvichienchai and Tanaka (2009) to solve high recall and low precision problem in finding office document in large databases; experiments of Abdulahhad et al (2011Abdulahhad et al ( , 2012aAbdulahhad et al ( , 2012b by RSV method on a medical database which contains medical images through documents; examining match between assigned descriptors and medical theses by Ansari (2005) and Dinh's et al (2013) research on effectiveness on biomedical indexing and retrieval based terminologies as well as researches on Index Islamicus like Kopycki (2003), Anwar (2001) and Salim et al (2010). There were few researches done on Index Islamicus but they were not specifically on the same objectives as this research that has been aimed to measure RSV or assessment of ranking mechanism.…”
Section: Ranking Mechanism Of Irs and Rsvmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The research [40] on the other hand, depicts a conceptual graph as a wider Ontology for the Holy Quran as a whole. The authors of [41] concern a multilingual Ontology for Islamic portal. We will discuss these articles in detail later at the section of the Islamic Knowledge.…”
Section: ) Arabic Ontologies Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Malaysia 2010, Juhana Salim et al treated the issue of Islamic multilingual Ontologies at [41]. Their research aimed to identify a Semantic Retrieval system to retrieve Islamic Knowledge in the three languages: Malay, English, and Arabic.…”
Section: ) Sw and The Islamic Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%