2013
DOI: 10.12785/irclr/020101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Textbook Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Textbooks have a strategic position in the national curriculum and the learning of learners, even politically contributing. Textbooks are an important 'vehicle' for curriculum promotion [10]. Some research also shows that there is a relationship between political and ideological framing within the national curriculum that has a significant impact on the production and use of textbooks [11][12][13].…”
Section: A Textbooksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Textbooks have a strategic position in the national curriculum and the learning of learners, even politically contributing. Textbooks are an important 'vehicle' for curriculum promotion [10]. Some research also shows that there is a relationship between political and ideological framing within the national curriculum that has a significant impact on the production and use of textbooks [11][12][13].…”
Section: A Textbooksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oleh karena itu materi dalam buku teks pelajaran merupakan hal penting yang perlu diperhatikan. Hal yang diperhatikan dalam buku teks tersebut antara lain struktur buku maupun presentasi materinya (O'Keeffe, 2013). Begitu pula halnya dengan materi yang disajikan dalam buku teks matematika hendaknya menjadi salah satu saran bagi siswa untuk belajar, sehingga meningkatkan kognitif dan pengetahuan siswa.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…In developing a means of analysing mathematical text, we have used grammatical tools drawn from SFL alongside Sfard's (2008) characterisation of mathematical discourse. SFL tools have been used previously in mathematics education to analyse various kinds of school mathematics texts by a number of researchers (including, for example, Chapman, 2003;Herbel-Eisenmann & Wagner, 2007;Morgan, 1998Morgan, , 2005O'Halloran, 2004;O'Keeffe, 2013). Although developed independently, the linguistic features that Sfard identifies are broadly compatible with SFL and offer the advantage of directing attention specifically to how they function in mathematical thinking (Tabach & Nachlieli, 2011).…”
Section: Developing Tools To Characterise School Mathematics Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%