1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01292771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A free convenient vector space for holomorphic spaces

Abstract: Abstract.In this paper we show that there exists a free convenient vector space for the case of holomorphic spaces and holomorphic maps. This means that for every space X with a holomorphic structure, there exists an appropriately complete locally convex vector space 2X and a holomorphic maplx:X ~.X, such that for any vector space of the same kind the map (tx)* : L(2X, E) ~ ~(X, E) is a bijection. Analogously to the smooth case treated in [-2, 5.1.1] the free convenient vector space 2X can be obtained as the M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We expect λ M (R) to be equal to C M (R, R) ′ as it is the case for the analogous situation of smooth mappings, see [19, 23.11], and of holomorphic mappings, see [25] and [26]. Proof.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We expect λ M (R) to be equal to C M (R, R) ′ as it is the case for the analogous situation of smooth mappings, see [19, 23.11], and of holomorphic mappings, see [25] and [26]. Proof.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…That also (4) describes the same bornology follows again by the S-uniform boundedness principle, since the inductive limit in (4) is regular by what we said before for the special case E = R and hence the structure of (4) is convenient. We expect λ M (R) to be equal to C M (R, R) as it is the case for the analogous situation of smooth mappings, see [19, 23.11], and of holomorphic mappings, see [25] and [26].…”
Section: Theorem Let M = (M K ) Be a Non-quasianalytic Dc-weight Seqmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the context of holomorphic spaces, we have a very similar situation, as shown in [13], where the analogon of Proposition 2.2 is established for Riemann surfaces.…”
Section: Two Isomorphy Results and Their Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…We expect λ M (R) to be equal to C M (R, R) ′ as it is the case for the analogous situation of smooth mappings, see [15, 23.11], and of holomorphic mappings, see [23] and [24]. Proof.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 89%