2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy robust evaluation model for selecting and ranking NPD projects using Bayesian belief network and weight-restricted DEA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, in aggregating the values for several criteria, previous studies have adopted a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model, which helps a decision-maker to choose the most desirable options (R&D projects in our case) based on conflicting criteria. The MCDM models frequently applied include AHP [3], analytic network process (ANP) [24], the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) [22], data envelopment analysis (DEA) [25], fuzzy-set theory [4,5], and decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) [26]. Sometimes, these techniques are integrated to better support decision-making (e.g., [27,28]).…”
Section: Randd Project Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, in aggregating the values for several criteria, previous studies have adopted a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model, which helps a decision-maker to choose the most desirable options (R&D projects in our case) based on conflicting criteria. The MCDM models frequently applied include AHP [3], analytic network process (ANP) [24], the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) [22], data envelopment analysis (DEA) [25], fuzzy-set theory [4,5], and decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) [26]. Sometimes, these techniques are integrated to better support decision-making (e.g., [27,28]).…”
Section: Randd Project Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Cooper et al (2000) [2], companies that use formal project selection approaches show greater project launch success as well as better sales and profit performance than others. As a result, extensive academic research has been conducted to help organizations make better decisions in R&D project selection, and a number of decision models and methods, such as analytic hierarchical process (AHP)-based modes [3], fuzzy evaluation processes [4,5], and portfolio-based methods [6,7], have been developed in the past four decades. However, current research findings indicate that many such complex models and methods are not being used, having only limited effects on decision-making for real-world project selection [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper provide a weight-restricted DEA model, with more subjective factors of decision ideology and value judgement. Evaluation results can be more approximates the real facts by adding the appropriate weights constraint conditions [6]. The rest of this article is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a new product is being developed, it is not normally possible to elicit explicit data because of the implicit nature of early-stage product conceptualisation (Yan et al 2006). Since Zadeh (1965) introduced fuzzy set theory, and Bellman and Zadeh (1970) described the decision-making method in fuzzy environments, an increasing number of manufacturing studies have dealt with fuzzy-logic-based decisionmaking models for new product development (Bu¨yu¨-ko¨zkan and Feyzio glu 2004, Mikhailov and Tsvetinov 2004, Feyzio glu and Bu¨yu¨ko¨zkan 2008, Zhang and Chu 2009, Chiang and Che 2010 and cooperative games where the knowledge about the worth of coalitions is described by fuzzy intervals (Nishizaki and Sakawa 2000, Mares 2001, Tsurumi et al 2001, Espin et al 2007, Al-Ahmari 2008, Jing and Lu 2010, Mallozzi et al 2011. According to Zadeh (1975), it is very difficult for conventional quantification to reasonably express complex situations and it is necessary to use linguistic variables whose values are words or sentences in a natural or artificial language.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%