2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy service quality based approach for performance evaluation of educational units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In present, FS is applied to many different sectors and also viewed to be more effective in assessing human's subjective judgments than the Likert scale [30][31][32][33][34][35]. Garcı ´a-Dastugue and Eroglu [36] explored that service quality of hospitals of Italia included four main constructs (healthcare staff and doctors, responsiveness, relationships between patients and doctors, and additional services) and 15 pertinent criteria.…”
Section: Theory Of the Fuzzy Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In present, FS is applied to many different sectors and also viewed to be more effective in assessing human's subjective judgments than the Likert scale [30][31][32][33][34][35]. Garcı ´a-Dastugue and Eroglu [36] explored that service quality of hospitals of Italia included four main constructs (healthcare staff and doctors, responsiveness, relationships between patients and doctors, and additional services) and 15 pertinent criteria.…”
Section: Theory Of the Fuzzy Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, because there was no universally applicable service quality measurement model, many studies could only be modified with the SERVQUAL model, e.g., [28,[119][120][121], and these studies used AHP or FAHP to analyze service quality, so they still needed to be tested with consistency. Compared with the universally applicable CV-SQ service quality measurement model proposed by this research, it can be universally applied to various service industries without modification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topical issues of ensuring the quality of educational services attract the attention of many specialists, including indicators of the quality of educational services (ANTONOVA et al, 2019;SEDYKH, 2019;GERRITSEN-VAN LEEUWENKAMP, 2017). Some authors propose various methods for monitoring the quality of provided educational services (NOJAVAN et al, 2021;MILYAEVA, 2019). The research raises questions of the need to develop a methodological toolkit for assessing students' satisfaction with the quality of educational services, taking into account the presentation of educational material, its content side; provision of lectures and practical classes, the competence of the teaching staff, their ethics and communication skills, the organization of independent and research work of students, the use of active and interactive forms of education, e-learning, the level of provision of the educational and methodological complex and the material and technical support of the educational process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foreign scientists note that assessing the quality of educational services using the results of student questionnaires using the SERVQUAL method as a model for assessing customer service. (NOJAVAN et al, 2021). Other authors consider individual components of monitoring the quality of provided educational services (KUZNETSOVA, 2018;BERTACCINI et al, 2021;ABBAS, 2020;LEE et al, 2019), as well as issues of organizing its implementation (SANTOS et al, 2020;KAZAKOVA, 2016;TRETYAKOVA et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%