2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A game-based production operation model for water resource management: An analysis of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen [27] considered the water suppliers' profitability and distributers' profitability under the perspective of social responsibility and economic benefit. In [28][29][30][31][32][33], the pricing strategies of a competitive two-tier water supply chain including one supplier and two distributers under two-part pricing contract and wholesale price contract was studied, and the findings reveal many practical management insights. In 2018, a study [3] investigated the decision-making strategies of water supply chain members by considering who played the leader and follower, and water resources management insights were provided.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen [27] considered the water suppliers' profitability and distributers' profitability under the perspective of social responsibility and economic benefit. In [28][29][30][31][32][33], the pricing strategies of a competitive two-tier water supply chain including one supplier and two distributers under two-part pricing contract and wholesale price contract was studied, and the findings reveal many practical management insights. In 2018, a study [3] investigated the decision-making strategies of water supply chain members by considering who played the leader and follower, and water resources management insights were provided.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the impact of the SNWD has been one of the most hotly debated topics for a long time during the planning, design, construction, and operation phases of the project (Liu, 1998; Wang et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2015). Previous studies of the SNWD project mainly focused on its impact on groundwater resources (Liang et al, 2019; Ye et al, 2014) and energy reductions (Zhao et al, 2017), its effect on phytoplankton (Chen et al, 2018; Zeng et al, 2015), and hydrological nitrogen and phosphorus pollution (Zhao et al, 2019), as well as the pricing system and water allocation schemes and policies (Du et al, 2019; Pohlner, 2016). However, very few studies have discussed the economic impacts of the SNWD within the context of climatic and societal change (Berkoff, 2003; Fang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, theories and techniques of supply chain management (SCM) have been applied in the IBWT projects to investigate the interactions among multiple stakeholders and develop equilibrium/coordination operational mechanisms, such as optimal pricing and coordination schemes for the SNWD supply chain [15], coordination mechanism based on revenue sharing contract for the SNWD supply chain with strategic customer [16], asymmetric Nash bargaining model for the SNWD supply chain [17], two-echelon water inventory model with inflow forecasting updates in an IBWT project [18], two-tier pricing and allocation schemes for the SNWD supply chain [19], competition intensity in the water supply chain under two contracts [20], power structures for the competitive water supply chains [21], optimal pricing and ordering strategies for dual competing water supply chains under three contracts [22], subsidy policies and operational strategies for the IBWT green supply chain under social welfare maximization [3,4], impact of the supply capacity constraint and fairness concern on the operational decisions and outcomes of the IBWT supply chain under random precipitation [5], and impact of fully/partial backlogging on the IBWT green supply chain coordination considering water delivery loss under random precipitation [6].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%