2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general approach to model interfaces using existing soil constitutive models application to hypoplasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to restrictions of the closed-source software Abaqus used by Stutz et al for the implementation of the interface model, the initial normal stress components furthermore have to be set isotropically, that is, 𝜎 𝑝1,0 = 𝜎 𝑝2,0 = 𝜎 𝑁,0 . 25 Using the approach by Stutz et al, a jump in the stress tensor between continuum and interface generally exists. The following condition of the jump [[𝝈]] = 𝝈 interface − 𝝈 continuum has to be satisfied 58,59 :…”
Section: Stress and Strain Conditions In The Interface Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to restrictions of the closed-source software Abaqus used by Stutz et al for the implementation of the interface model, the initial normal stress components furthermore have to be set isotropically, that is, 𝜎 𝑝1,0 = 𝜎 𝑝2,0 = 𝜎 𝑁,0 . 25 Using the approach by Stutz et al, a jump in the stress tensor between continuum and interface generally exists. The following condition of the jump [[𝝈]] = 𝝈 interface − 𝝈 continuum has to be satisfied 58,59 :…”
Section: Stress and Strain Conditions In The Interface Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] or they are based on models originally developed for the constitutive modelling of the continuum (see e.g., Ref. 6,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. For the second approach, the stress and strain in the interface have to be given in a global continuum setting (i.e., the full tensors), whereas in the first approach only the normal (contact) stress, the shear stress and the shear strain of the interface zone are conventionally considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…71 Thus, the thickness of the shear band is not a material constant and strongly influenced by the interaction between the properties of the material model and the boundary conditions considered. In this context, the performance of interface elements with zero thickness used in finite element simulations, for example, Stutz et al, 91 are restricted to cases when the evolution of the finite thickness of shear bands is not of interest.…”
Section: Influence Of Prescribed Interface Friction Angle and Shear Box Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical algorithm for the membrane-soil interaction was the mortar method in which at the soil surface, the slave is defined, and for the membrane, the master surface is applied. This modelling technique has been proven to be efficient for soil-structure interface modelling [10] compared to more classical approaches such as, e.g., zero-thickness interface elements as [11,12]. The membrane itself is modelled using shell elements (SAX1) considering the thickness of the membrane.…”
Section: Boundary Value Problem and Constitutive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%