2021
DOI: 10.1111/mec.16291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genomic and morphometric analysis of alpine bumblebees: Ongoing reductions in tongue length but no clear genetic component

Abstract: Over the last six decades, populations of the bumblebees Bombus sylvicola and Bombus balteatus in Colorado have experienced decreases in tongue length, a trait important for plant‐pollinator mutualisms. It has been hypothesized that this observation reflects selection resulting from shifts in floral composition under climate change. Here we used morphometrics and population genomics to determine whether morphological change is ongoing, investigate the genetic basis of morphological variation, and analyse popul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(181 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were interested in determining whether the greater resolution afforded by WGR data would provide additional evidence for gene flow barriers across the sampled regions, but no major differences emerged compared to prior studies. Low genetic differentiation over large spatial scales, is often observed in bumble bee species in the absence of obvious physical dispersal barriers (Christmas et al, 2022;Heraghty et al, 2022;J. B. Koch, Looney, Sheppard, & Strange, 2017;Lozier et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were interested in determining whether the greater resolution afforded by WGR data would provide additional evidence for gene flow barriers across the sampled regions, but no major differences emerged compared to prior studies. Low genetic differentiation over large spatial scales, is often observed in bumble bee species in the absence of obvious physical dispersal barriers (Christmas et al, 2022;Heraghty et al, 2022;J. B. Koch, Looney, Sheppard, & Strange, 2017;Lozier et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were interested in determining whether the greater resolution afforded by WGR data would provide additional evidence for gene flow barriers across the sampled regions, but no major differences emerged compared to prior studies. Low genetic differentiation over large spatial scales is often observed in bumble bee species in the absence of obvious physical dispersal barriers (Christmas et al, 2022; Heraghty et al, 2022; Koch et al, 2017; Lozier et al, 2011). Although long‐distance dispersal of individual reproductives (gynes or drones) may be rare (Williams et al, 2022), stepping stone dispersal through suitable habitat is likely in bumble bees (Williams et al, 2018; Williams et al, 2022) and would contribute to weak genetic structure when species inhabit continuous geographic ranges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, there seems to be no GWAS study that analyses long-term infection intensity as we do here. Rather, several GWAS studies in bumble bees address morphological traits, such as colouration [ 88 , 89 ], or tongue length [ 90 ]. A direct comparison with other studies is therefore not yet feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%