2017
DOI: 10.5194/essd-9-389-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global water resources ensemble of hydrological models: the eartH2Observe Tier-1 dataset

Abstract: Abstract. The dataset presented here consists of an ensemble of 10 global hydrological and land surface models for the period 1979–2012 using a reanalysis-based meteorological forcing dataset (0.5° resolution). The current dataset serves as a state of the art in current global hydrological modelling and as a benchmark for further improvements in the coming years. A signal-to-noise ratio analysis revealed low inter-model agreement over (i) snow-dominated regions and (ii) tropical rainforest and monsoon areas. T… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
192
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
5
192
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). While the mean seasonal variations of both observational data streams are relatively robust and have been used for model evaluation before (Alkama et al, 2010;Schellekens et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2017), their inter-annual variations are more uncertain and contain considerable noise. This clearly reduces the information content in the observational data, so that we evaluate the IAV in more qualitative terms.…”
Section: Performance Of the Spatially Integrated Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4). While the mean seasonal variations of both observational data streams are relatively robust and have been used for model evaluation before (Alkama et al, 2010;Schellekens et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2017), their inter-annual variations are more uncertain and contain considerable noise. This clearly reduces the information content in the observational data, so that we evaluate the IAV in more qualitative terms.…”
Section: Performance Of the Spatially Integrated Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to benchmark our model against current stateof-the-art hydrological models, we compared its simulations with the multi-model ensemble of the global hydrological and land surface models of the eartH2Observe dataset (Schellekens et al, 2017). This ensemble includes HTESSEL-CaMa (Balsamo et al, 2009), JULES Clark et al, 2011), LISFLOOD (van der Knijff et al, 2010), ORCHIDEE (Krinner et al, 2005;Ngo-Duc et al, 2007;d'Orgeval et al, 2008), SURFEX-TRIP (Alkama et al, 2010;Decharme et al, 2013), W3RA (van Dijk andWarren, 2010;van Dijk et al, 2014), WaterGAP3 (Flörke et al, 2013;Döll et al, 2009), PCR-GLOBWB (van Beek et al, 2011Wada et al, 2014), and SWBM (Orth et al, 2013).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations