2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2009.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A goal programming mixed-model line balancing for processing time and physical workload

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The phsyical workload is considered by certain studies as an additional restraint for the pursuit of assembly lines that are well-designed. Choi (2009) presented a model of integer program that incorporates excessive work load of processing duration and physical work load including several risk factors. In order to solve it, the target programming approach and a suitable algorithm process techniques were used.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phsyical workload is considered by certain studies as an additional restraint for the pursuit of assembly lines that are well-designed. Choi (2009) presented a model of integer program that incorporates excessive work load of processing duration and physical work load including several risk factors. In order to solve it, the target programming approach and a suitable algorithm process techniques were used.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beberapa penelitian lainnya, seperti yang dilakukan oleh Marian, dkk. (2006), Choi (2009), Xu, dkk. (2011), Otto dan Scholl (2011, serta Boenzi, dkk.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Few researches jointly consider physical demands and completion time of tasks in assignment problems, and solve them using heuristic methods (Carnahan et al, 2000a(Carnahan et al, , 2000bChoi, 2009;Otto and Scholl, 2011). The integration of ergonomic aspects, as well as worker's skills, within traditional production oriented management tools will be crucial for future research (Battaia and Dolgui, 2013).…”
Section: Ergonomic Job Rotation Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%