2017
DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3390
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A guide to Bayesian model checking for ecologists

Abstract: Abstract. Checking that models adequately represent data is an essential component

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following model convergence, we performed a posterior predictive check (Conn et al. ), in which we simulated replacement data sets based on parameter values from posterior distributions of our converged model that were relevant to each sub‐model (i.e., CMR, age‐ratio model, band ratio model) and determined whether these simulated data sets were different from the observed data that informed each model. We reported Bayesian p ‐values based on comparisons between the estimated Freeman–Tukey statistic (Kéry and Schaub ) for both the observed and simulated data sets, in which Bayesian p ‐values near 0.5 indicate goodness of fit and values that approach 0.0 or 1.0 indicate lack of fit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following model convergence, we performed a posterior predictive check (Conn et al. ), in which we simulated replacement data sets based on parameter values from posterior distributions of our converged model that were relevant to each sub‐model (i.e., CMR, age‐ratio model, band ratio model) and determined whether these simulated data sets were different from the observed data that informed each model. We reported Bayesian p ‐values based on comparisons between the estimated Freeman–Tukey statistic (Kéry and Schaub ) for both the observed and simulated data sets, in which Bayesian p ‐values near 0.5 indicate goodness of fit and values that approach 0.0 or 1.0 indicate lack of fit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…assemblages) and the missing hatching success data, we used a 10-fold cross-validation approach to fit and validate the model , Roberts et al 2017, Conn et al 2018.…”
Section: Alien Mammal Assemblagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The script for fitting the Bayesian hierarchical model is available in Supplementary Appendix S1 (available online). We assessed the goodness of the fit and the predictive abilities of the hierarchical model by estimating a Bayesian p-value based on the deviance of the model , Kéry & Royle 2016, Conn et al 2018. A Bayesian p-value compares the estimate of a goodness-of-fit testthe deviance in this casewith the test expected value if the model is adequate.…”
Section: Alien Mammal Assemblagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The red dashed line indicates zero difference. 0.08 and the overdispersion parameter (ĉ ) was 1.5, indicating the absence of major lack of fit (Conn et al 2018).…”
Section: Pheasant Chick Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%