2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2009.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A heating process of Kuchi-erabu-jima volcano, Japan, as inferred from geomagnetic field variations and electrical structure

Abstract: Since August 2000, we have recorded the total intensity of the geomagnetic field at the summit area of Kuchi-erabu-jima volcano, where phreatic eruptions have repeatedly occurred. A time series analysis has shown that the variations in the geomagnetic field since 2001 have a strong relationship to an increase in volcanic activity. These variations indicate thermal demagnetization of the subsurface around the presently active crater. The demagnetization source for the early variations, until summer 2002, was es… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their model is a conceptual one and does not account for the localized release of latent heat at a certain depth, nor does it provide mechanism for reducing heat discharge from the crater. A fully viable explanation might be common to other volcanoes where remarkable magnetic field changes during quiescent periods have been reported (e.g., Kanda et al 2010;Kuchi-no-Erabujima Volcano).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, their model is a conceptual one and does not account for the localized release of latent heat at a certain depth, nor does it provide mechanism for reducing heat discharge from the crater. A fully viable explanation might be common to other volcanoes where remarkable magnetic field changes during quiescent periods have been reported (e.g., Kanda et al 2010;Kuchi-no-Erabujima Volcano).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Tanaka (1993) monitored the magnetic field near the active crater of Aso volcano, Japan to determine that gradual demagnetisation (due to heating) occurred beneath the crater when the surface activity appeared calm; however, rapid remagnetisation (on cooling) followed explosive events. 6 6 Kanda et al (2010), on the basis of continuous monitoring, detected a gradual build-up of thermal demagnetisation that coincided with localised ground inflation at Kuchi-erabu-jima volcano, Japan. Further, Nakatsuka et al (2009) and Hashimoto et al (2011) both reported temporal changes in the magnetic field between separate airborne surveys by using a crewed helicopter at Asama and Usu volcanoes, respectively.…”
Section: Magnetic Measurements On Volcanoesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we have already used the MT method to evaluate the large-scale subsurface resistivity structure present within the seismogenic zone beneath the Japanese Archipelago Island Arc system (Ogawa et al, 2001;Uyeshima et al, 2005;Yoshimura et al, 2009), and to evaluate the smaller-scale (shallow) resistivity structure beneath a number of historically active Japanese volcanoes (Ogawa et al, 1998;Hase et al, 2005;Aizawa et al, 2009b;Kanda et al, 2010).…”
Section: Magnetotelluric Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conductive clay layers usually exhibit relatively low permeability (e.g., Jones and Dumas, 1993;Nurhasan et al, 2006;Aizawa et al, 2009a;Yamaya et al, 2009;Kanda et al, 2010). In particular, the top of such a clay layer can be sealed (i.e., impermeable), such that in the subsurface, any shallow, cold groundwater do not become wellmixed with deep, hot hydrothermal waters (Aizawa et al, 2009a).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Background Resistivity Structurementioning
confidence: 99%