2009 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cicc.2009.5280747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A heterogeneous digital signal processor implementation for dynamically reconfigurable computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to notice that while DSP instructions do not improve the performance of the core during execution of the smart trigger kernel, its implementation on the IPA provides even more benefits with respect to the data-flow part of the application (motion detection), improving performance by 10x with respect to execution on the processor (Table V). C. Comparison with the state of the art architectures Table VI presents the performance comparison of the smart visual trigger application running on a CPU and two state of the art reconfigurable array architectures [7] [8], chosen due to the availability of the target application, with similar features to other state of the art CGRAs. Results show that, although the two state of the art CGRAs deliver huge performance when dealing with the data-flow portion of the application, thanks to highly optimized and pipelined datapath that allows to implement operations on binary images as boolean operations [7], they are not able to implement the control dominated kernel, which runs on the CPU forming a major bottleneck for performance when considering the whole application.…”
Section: B Performance and Energy Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to notice that while DSP instructions do not improve the performance of the core during execution of the smart trigger kernel, its implementation on the IPA provides even more benefits with respect to the data-flow part of the application (motion detection), improving performance by 10x with respect to execution on the processor (Table V). C. Comparison with the state of the art architectures Table VI presents the performance comparison of the smart visual trigger application running on a CPU and two state of the art reconfigurable array architectures [7] [8], chosen due to the availability of the target application, with similar features to other state of the art CGRAs. Results show that, although the two state of the art CGRAs deliver huge performance when dealing with the data-flow portion of the application, thanks to highly optimized and pipelined datapath that allows to implement operations on binary images as boolean operations [7], they are not able to implement the control dominated kernel, which runs on the CPU forming a major bottleneck for performance when considering the whole application.…”
Section: B Performance and Energy Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MORPHEUS approach has been evaluated by the production of a prototype chip [41]. Figure 12 shows a picture of this chip.…”
Section: Chip Prototypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MORPHEUS chip was designed and fabricated using a CMOS 90nm process of ST Microelectronics [Rossi et al 2009]. A limited area budget forced size limits on the individual cores.…”
Section: The Chip Prototypementioning
confidence: 99%