2016
DOI: 10.3233/sw-160226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hierarchical aggregation framework for efficient multilevel visual exploration and analysis

Abstract: Abstract. Data exploration and visualization systems are of great importance in the Big Data era, in which the volume and heterogeneity of available information make it difficult for humans to manually explore and analyse data. Most traditional systems operate in an offline way, limited to accessing preprocessed (static) sets of data. They also restrict themselves to dealing with small dataset sizes, which can be easily handled with conventional techniques. However, the Big Data era has realized the availabili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Facet Graphs [38], gFacet [39], and tFacet [40], are early efforts in this area. More recent attempts include Rhizomer [41], which combines navigation menus and maps to provide flexible exploration between different classes; Facete [42], a visualization-based exploration tool that offers faceted filtering functionalities; Hippalus [43], which allows users to rank the facets according to their preferences; Voyager [44], which couples faceted browsing with visualization recommendation to support users exploration; and SynopsViz [45], which provides faceted browsing and filtering RDF over classes and properties. Although these approaches provide support for user exploration, layman users who are performing exploratory search tasks to learn or investigate a new topic, can be cognitively overloaded, especially when the facets provide many options (i.e.…”
Section: Text-based Semantic Data Browsersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facet Graphs [38], gFacet [39], and tFacet [40], are early efforts in this area. More recent attempts include Rhizomer [41], which combines navigation menus and maps to provide flexible exploration between different classes; Facete [42], a visualization-based exploration tool that offers faceted filtering functionalities; Hippalus [43], which allows users to rank the facets according to their preferences; Voyager [44], which couples faceted browsing with visualization recommendation to support users exploration; and SynopsViz [45], which provides faceted browsing and filtering RDF over classes and properties. Although these approaches provide support for user exploration, layman users who are performing exploratory search tasks to learn or investigate a new topic, can be cognitively overloaded, especially when the facets provide many options (i.e.…”
Section: Text-based Semantic Data Browsersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elqvist et al [13] provided general guidelines for multiscale representations and interactions, based on such hierarchical aggregation. Bikakis et al [30] presented a framework for hierarchical aggregation oriented towards the computational aspects of hierarchical navigation. Interactively changing the level of detail can be integrated into different ways (see [31] for a general review).…”
Section: Multiscale Parallel Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the used visualization, research is being done to improve the support for large datasets. For example, Bikakis et al [4] introduce a generic model for organizing, and analyzing numeric and temporal data in a multilevel fashion to deal with the challenges that come with the use of large datasets, such as information overload. The model is not tied to a specific visualization and, thus, it can be used with any of the aforementioned tools to improve the support for such datasets.…”
Section: Linked Data Visualizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays Linked Data still stems from (semi-)structured formats. A few of the most well-known and larger Linked Data sets 2 [23] are: DBpedia dataset 3 [6], with approximately 1.39 billion triples derived from Wikipedia 4 where the data is originally represented in the wikitext syntax; Linked Geo Data 5 [58] with approximately 1.38 billion triples derived from Open Street Map planet files loaded in multiple databases; UniProt [12] (UniPro-tKB, Uniref and UniParc), with approximately 45 billion triples across 3 datasets derived from the UniProt Knowledgebase 6 ; and Bio2rdf 7 [2], with approximately 11 billion triples across 35 datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%